With the news of the secret $100 million investment in Bluesky by Bain, I keep thinking about protocols.
Maybe the perceived "drawbacks" of #ActivityPub are ultimately strengths?
#ATproto handles identity in a way that allows a single sign-in across apps. But wouldn't this make it easier to profile you? Is this why crypto VCs are so attracted to it?
And ATproto has funding in the 100s of millions by VCs but at some point they'll want to turn a profit. There is ZERO pressure here to ensh*tt*fy
@_elena I keep asking for this "decentralized" protocol to help me move off of all infrastructure controlled by the Bluesky corporation, and I keep getting the answer "well…so…uh…actually…"
Unfortunately I'm not waiting around for the "exit from evil billionaire control" scenario Jay Graber talked about a year ago or whatever, because that's already happened. So if I can't use ATProto without Bluesky, I guess I won't use ATProto. 🤷🏻♂️
@jaredwhite I noticed your posts Jared… and I was following with curiosity the replies. It doesn’t look good.
What worries me is that here in Europe advocacy for the open social web groups the two protocols together (ATProto and ActivityPub).
Also: European politicians and media organizations are gravitating towards Bluesky / ATproto and mostly ignoring the Fediverse…
@_elena Well…I would say it's "complicated".
I could envision a world where every major country or socioeconomic region has its own ATProto-based social network, because they have the resources to run that kind of infrastructure at scale. Not saying I like the idea, but that seems to be how ATProto was structured. Several *large enterprises* could run services which interoperate.
That's quite different from ActivityPub where you can run a decent social networking instance off a Raspberry Pi. 😄
@jaredwhite totally. BTW did you get an answer to your question yesterday?
I also wonder if there are ATProto equivalents to Phanpy or masto-fe... you know, web clients that allow you to log in with your credentials instead of going to bsky.app
@_elena Sounds like there are some potential destinations in development, but nothing has become fully baked yet apart from Blacksky.
I already use a custom frontend to Bluesky called Klearsky…I can't actually log into the Bluesky web app at all. Somehow I got caught up in their age verification requirements, even though I'm based in Oregon. 🤷🏻♂️
Yes, there are lots of different web and mobile clients. I use blacksky.community, which also has its own appview, so am almost completely independent of Bluesky infrastructure. @stefan mentioned Red Dwarf, and I think there are a handful of others that also allow you to select an appview (very analagous to how phanpy lets you choose an instance) so also allow almost complete independence.
In terms of your initial question, I think that many people (including me!) find a multiple-identity approach very valuable for a variety of reasons. That said, today's ActivityPub-based software doesn't handle multiple identities any better than ATProto-based software. So like so many other things with fedi, it's a potential strength that hasn't been leveraged.
Here's a conveniently-timed article looking at doing things completely independent of Bluesky - https://mia.leaflet.pub/3mhw3hzwtn224
@jdp23 Looks a bit involved. Interesting read, though, thank you for sharing!
Oh yeah, it's definitely at the duct tape and baling wire stage in general -- @jaredwhite is very right that right now Blacksky is the only reasonably-mature mostly-independent microblogging-focused tech stack. (Blacksky still uses Bluesky's PLC directory, although they do have a mirror that could if necessary fall back on; also they don't have their own mobile app yet, and still use some of Bluesky's moderation services.)
@jdp23 Are they also using Bluesky's servers for DMs, since those are stored off-protocol?
Or do non-Bluesky AppViews just don't have DMs? (Or whichever part of the stack is responsible for that.)
I'm pretty sure they store DMs in the Blacksky AppView (which is a fork of the Bluesky AppView) but not 100% positive.
You can run some of the ATProto infrastructure on a Raspberry Pi as well, with some of the same trade-offs we have here, like not having the full network view.
https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/116126040489956521
Not really trying to advocate for the Atmosphere here, mind you, but there is quite a lot of momentum over there.
And there is definitely progress, even if it's slow. A bit like here.
@coreysnipes I do like that there is interest in implementing some of the better ideas here, things like portable identity, or at least better account migration.
But we all know here there is just not enough funding for all the work that's needed.
Yes, Bluesky/Atmosphere is heavily subsidized right now, but still, there is a ton of momentum and excitement around it.
There are people putting in the effort to make the ecosystem more decentralized, many don't like how much control Bluesky the company has.
And they might just very well succeed.
@stefan
I still believe at some point in the future both protocols will converge. I imagine adding ActivityPub directly on top of a PDS would be one way (there's been a few experiments with that). I know there's a few AtProto apps that would like to add ActivityPub at the Application level. And it's probably only a matter of time before someone sets up an ActivityPub server that lets you sign in with your PDS, there's a lot of options out there, just have to figure out what works best for people (and figure out how to fund it all)
Yes, this is what I believe myself as well.
And some/all of you might know that wafrn comes with a built-in PDS already.
https://wafrn.net/faq/user.html#blueskyIntegration
If I was starting with the fediverse today, I might just be looking into running my server with it instead of Mastodon, honestly.
Yes, well, given the likely budget/time constraints, probably better than anything I'd be able to make.
@tom @coreysnipes @_elena @stefan @jaredwhite
we cant hire an UI designer
you can pay for one here
@gabboman @tom @coreysnipes @_elena @stefan I apologize for my comment, I know OSS dev is hard and I didn't mean to sound unkind.
Best wishes.
@tom @coreysnipes @_elena @stefan @jaredwhite
Sorry was a day today.
The web is more tumblr inspired, but the mobile app has a different design and you may enjoy that one instead.
The app is made by a different person with different design ideas!
@tom @stefan @coreysnipes @_elena @jaredwhite @[email protected]
you know you could've just not say that considering it's an unambiguous statement that cannot be really misinterpreted?
Well there are the people working at Bluesky the company (doesn't seem to be my crowd either) and then there's the development community trying to make the Atmosphere independent from them.
Not super familiar with the second group, other than folks I already know from here, but I do give them some benefit of doubt.
I mean, some of them are doing some interesting stuff, and again, trying to create independence from Bluesky the company. And that's quite commendable.
Yeah, I'd prefer to see them put in the effort here, but fediverse development is arguably more challenging, and with a smaller and less diverse userbase, probably less rewarding.
@stefan @coreysnipes @_elena Sure, there's a distinction between the corp and the folks working on the side on indie flavorings.
But it feels way too much like another Swift story to me (all attempts by non-Apple players to make Swift a great language ecosystem apart from Apple have largely fallen by the wayside… a shame really, because Swift is a pretty cool language).
@jaredwhite Yes, I think that's the big question, whether the larger Atmosphere will survive Bluesky's inevitable enshittification. A year ago, I would've said, probably not.
Today, I don't know. Maybe?
Elena Rossini ⁂
Jared White (ResistanceNet ✊)
Jon
Stefan Bohacek
Corey Snipes 🌱
Tom Casavant
gabboman the wafrn dev
pyro gaming