OK this is a stupid question, but why have Linux projects (apparently) fallen over themselves to comply with an age-recording statute in a single US state (albeit a large one), when those projects have been failing for decades to respect national and even international law regarding disability?

#accessibility #disability #linux #FreeSoftware #fascism #AgeVerification #infantilism

@iaruffell

Because it's not a single state, not even a single country. I think this video about systemd is elucidating:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5AcreFk40U

Watch until the end, because the last message is important.

#systemd #linux #ageverification

We Need To Talk About The Systemd Birth Date Situation

YouTube

@ammdias

I thought the Colorado situation was ongoing. But that doesn't invalidate my point that some statutes are given rapid attention and others, which are designed to help minorities are not.

Oh, and at the risk of being snarky, I note with amusement that a response to a point about accessibility is a youtube video. Honey, it is wasted on me.

@iaruffell @ammdias

These age-verification laws are getting promoted by Meta, in their ongoing efforts to evade culpability for content moderation & to eliminate privacy as a civil right.
https://www.gadgetreview.com/reddit-user-uncovers-who-is-behind-metas-2b-lobbying-for-invasive-age-verification-tech

https://fortune.com/2026/03/02/social-media-companies-age-verification-addiction-privacy-concerns/

https://thedeepdive.ca/who-pushes-age-verification-bills/

Meta never abided by child protection laws before. Why now?
https://archive.is/ZyajL

https://winbuzzer.com/2026/03/18/reddit-user-uncovers-meta-2b-lobbying-age-verification-xcxwbn/

They want to be able to sell ads adjacent to CSAM content for the Epstein Class & not face the type of repercussions ...

1/

Reddit User Uncovers Who Is Behind Meta’s $2B Lobbying for Invasive Age Verification Tech

Meta funneled $2B through nonprofit shells to push age verification laws targeting Apple and Google while exempting its own platforms from surveillance requirements.

Gadget Review

@Npars01 @ammdias

Certainly. But that doesn't address my question about the readiness of FLOSS to comply in one case and not the other.

Privacy is enshrined in Article 8 of ECHR, which is a bit harder to undo, although the right in the UK are now intent on leaving (for other reasons).

@iaruffell @ammdias

My guess?

Linux developers may have patrons that they don't want to irritate.

My observation is that swift unemployment in a day job follows when a FOSS developer fails to fall in line.

@ tante@ tldr.nettime.org is just one example I can cite.

Age verification is getting unprecedented levels of support from funded mass malign influence campaigns.

@Npars01 @iaruffell @ammdias The Linux Foundation has some pretty big corporate patrons.

@Npars01 @iaruffell @ammdias I note that Meta is among their supporters.

I just went to their website, and the first thing you see is this blurb saying, “The Linux Foundation is a neutral, trusted hub for developers and organizations to code, manage, and scale open technology projects and ecosystems.”

NEUTRAL!
NEUTRAL!

Tell me you’re beholden to your corporate overlords without telling me you’re beholden to your corporate overlords.

@ramsey @Npars01 @iaruffell @ammdias The #Linux Foundation has truly lost its soul. It can't defend its own interests from #Meta. It can't defend its own identity. It can't defend its own relevancy. It can't remain true to its own original audience and followers, and their values.

@gtsadmin @ramsey @iaruffell @ammdias

There is no fate but what we make.

Linux will not be subsumed into Meta's plans for state surveillance.

Why?
Linux people ascribe to John Oliver's credo...

@Npars01 @gtsadmin @ramsey @iaruffell @ammdias The beauty of open source is that there will always be projects who refuse to comply with the censorship efforts. OpenBSD is among several that would rather entirely close shop than do this.