The capability gap.

#USpol #Ukraine #Iran

@jmaris
I thought patriots shooting down Shaheds was a rare event, and most of Shaheds are being shot down by fighter jets?
@wolf480pl @jmaris in Ukraine, yes. They can't afford to waste patriots for shaheds.
(Ukraine used less patriots in 3 years than the US in 3 days. Imagine what Ukraine could have done with those patriots instead)

@Schafstelze @wolf480pl @jmaris

«They can't afford to waste patriots for shaheds.»

🇺🇸 💀 No wonder they can't, the Patriots has not ever been «on sale» at the DumpShop! 🐓

@Schafstelze @jmaris
no I also mean in the Persian Gulf

USA does not even have enough patriots missile in stockpile to shoot one shahed with one patriot missile.

And it still needs to keep most of those missiles for a potential war with China.

And a patriot battery usually fires at least two missiles in parallel at any single target.

If money was the problem, USA could be shooting down shaheds with patriots and win. But the problem is production rate.

@wolf480pl @jmaris The US wasted 800 Patriots within three days. But as Trump said, they don't need help from Ukraine...

@Schafstelze @jmaris
Iran fired 1000+ shaheds in the first 3 days of the war, and ~400 ballistic missiles.

I'm guessing most of these patriots were used against ballistic missiles.

Still, that's an insanely high number of patriots and I'm worried about US's stockpile now...

@jmaris Shaheds (~10k) are able to take down patriot missiles (~3000k) is closer to reality.
@jmaris asymmetrical warfare is warfare

@jmaris

The USA never learned anything from Vietnam.

"A spear. A goddam spear."

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=th-RRoCfMdQ

APOCALYPSE NOW (1979) | Arrows & Spears Attack scene 4K UHD

YouTube
@jmaris And only one of these two things is actually legal.

@nazokiyoubinbou i'm pretty sure both air defense and shooting down an enemy helicopter while repelling an invasion are both legal.

What is not legal is the way the US started the war with Iran

@jmaris You guessed wrong which one I meant.

The attack the US made is quite illegal by multiple definitions including our own laws.

Ukraine defending itself against an illegal invader is legal by any definition.

@jmaris I suspect that the real scandal is how horribly much defence contractors are ripping off US taxpayers. I remember when the Patriot was new -- half a century ago. It runs on radar -- developed during WW2. How does anything that old cost that much?

@wesdym The arms market has to be a very false one. It is a major part of the attraction of wars.

Vast monies to made in supplying devices to kill people.