@JackMexa4 @didgebaba @Richard_Littler
biggest problem with wealth is that it inherently disincentivizes doing anything that promotes self worth - why cook your own food when you can hire a chef and have it delivered to you by a butler?
problem with getting someone else to do it, and it's getting quite salient with LLM usage, is that it induces cognitive and physical decline. you didn't use it, so you lose it.
the privilege of not having to do it anymore quickly devolves into the prison of being unable to do it anymore.
soon wealth becomes the only thing that you have, and you're stuck unable to do anything for yourself, especially if you haven't done it before.
the solution is to build a society that promotes learning new skills and life fulfillment as primary values, above how much wealth you have.
nobody feels horribly insecure anymore, and you'll naturally make a lot of wealth with such a society regardless.
furthermore, a nation not tied to wealth as a value and that prioritizes education and skill over it can do a hell of a lot more on the world stage.
(*cough* china *cough*)
@didgebaba just like there should be a floor for poverty which the state does not allow anyone to fall under, so their basic living needs are met, there should be an upper limit as well that no individual can claim as their personal property. In a similar fashion, organizations should also have limits on how much wealth can be under their private control before they need to have representation from worker unions and democratic oversight as well as shareholders to steer decisionmaking to be accountable for dowmstream effects, not just profit.
@raven667 the way to think is what is your budgeted resiliency for bad decisions destroying value, how much is one person allowed to screw up, and when do we need to have collective supervison of resources.