A small set of people are merging changes to various Linux components to make sure every application knows your birth date.

This is being done rapidly by people with questionable justifications and being merged with no youth and few marginalized people involved.

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/-/merge_requests/176#0b07c0cc4d49be119f65cdb2037440f56eed647a

user: Add BirthDate with polkit-gated GetBirthDate and SetBirthDate methods (!176) · Merge requests · accountsservice / accountsservice · GitLab

Summary Add a BirthDate field to the user account interface. For non-homed users, the value is stored...

GitLab

In case anyone is unclear, since I hear he's also campaigning against this Linux age-gating trash:

Bryan Lunduke is a fascist hatemonger. He represents the absolute worst in free software and I believe he should be ostracized from any and all parts of our community. He wants software freedom for himself and in the abstract but despises individuals expressing their freedom. He believes in a software freedom that is hollowed out and missing love.

Also, no Soundcloud but I just released v1 of dumpcar, which provides commands for dumping and restoring the contents of your Rails PostgreSQL databases.

If you ever need to restore from a prod DB dump or want to save your dev DB's state before blowing it up, it's pretty slick.

https://github.com/PeevRb/dumpcar

GitHub - PeevRb/dumpcar: Commands for dumping and restoring the contents of your Rails PostgreSQL database

Commands for dumping and restoring the contents of your Rails PostgreSQL database - PeevRb/dumpcar

GitHub

@wwahammy he don't like wokes and he complains about new lead debian project because she is a women who wants more inclusivity

Lunduke = 💩💩💩

Need more real free software radical left/rogressiv activists'

@wwahammy unless people have ample proof on what he believes in I suggest that they moderate their tone. This looks like a hate campaign to me.

Some people only wanna implement/support laws they like. That's not how laws work.

The cyberspace is not independent.

@rriemann
That's literally how laws work. If the people disagree with them, they revolt, and get bad laws struck off. There are many many examples of this through the ages.

By supporting them, you become the problem.
@wwahammy

@markotway @wwahammy

How about targeting with revolts politicians and not opensource developers?

@rriemann
Why not both? Complicity needs to be socially costly.

@markotway @wwahammy

@dzwiedziu @markotway @wwahammy

These developers write code. That's an act of free speech. If you don't like their code, don't use it. Many opensource projects are do-cracies. Write your own fork if you like. Join a party. Create a party. But don't harass opensource developers.

@rriemann
“Free speech” isn't freedom from consequences and critique isn't harassment.

“Fork your own” is a fallacy. Not many people can code enough or have the resources to fork anything, not to mention the project big enough to develop a megalomania of thinking it's the OS.

@markotway @wwahammy

@rriemann
That's a stupid statement.

If somebody puts up posters that promote fascism and restrict the rights of others, you could claim "these printers just make posters".

If you're writing code that furthers the goals of fascism, then you deserve to be harassed.

And "don't use their code" isn't a great statement if these people are shoehorning this crap into every open source OS, then options to not use it become limited.

It's a bit like saying "if you don't like fascist countries don't live in them". It's a privileged and small-minded attitude.

@dzwiedziu @wwahammy

@rriemann @dzwiedziu @markotway @wwahammy

Agree with @dzwiedziu , systemd is used in a lot of distro, we have the possibility to discuss, we don't need birth date at any time. So for me this type of PR cannot be opt-in for future user, there are too much privacy in game for users that don't have super admin right on their system, and they're are lot in entreprise. And Free Speech need to protect the actual minority, even if it's 100 people in our actual fucking world of technopolice and surveillance, in any case IMHO. In short, this is a bad move.

@rriemann Your privilege is showing.

@rriemann @dzwiedziu @markotway @wwahammy Speaking as an open source developer, hard disagree. "Write your own fork" is a very bad take.

Protest it at every level, including social consequences for the developer.

@rriemann @markotway @wwahammy How about the footsoldiers of fascism, that make it easier to roll out oppressive control structures, also be named, shamed, and ostracized? We are capable of doing both things, they are both worth doing.
@rriemann @wwahammy It would've been good to make it independent, though 

@rriemann @wwahammy Here, have this reddit thread from 5 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/muc18q/whats_the_deal_with_bryan_lunduke/

FWIW, I'm finding it rather worrying that a person with your views is working with @EUCommission, and has an influence on its policies.

What's the deal with Bryan Lunduke?

I used to watch him a couple of years ago, but it seems that stuff happened. I'll give you a few examples, but I don't see him being mentioned too...

reddit
@agturcz @wwahammy @EUCommission Can you be more specific?
@rriemann @wwahammy I don't need to. There is enough in the comments already.

@agturcz @rriemann @wwahammy @EUCommission the E.U. Commission should be mindful of harboring fascist-friendly individuals. Code is political. There is no act that affects many others that is mot political.

Riemann must be considered as fascist friendly, as he defends openly fascist, openly homophobic, openly transphobic individuals such as Lunduke.

@rriemann are we talking about Lunduke? Because I know exactly what he believes he says it every moment of every day.

@rriemann @wwahammy yeah, no, there’s ample evidence of Lunduke’s opinions because he’s been making them clear for years.

What’s your objection to a hate campagn against fascists?

@rriemann @wwahammy Nah, Lunduke's a fascist. It's good, actually, to criticize him for holding and espousing fascist views.

You don't get a free pass on that bullshit.

@rriemann @wwahammy Like, he's for software freedom, so long as no one uses it to implement pride flag themes, or to, I dunno, be Muslim?

He intentionally misgenders trans speakers, is obssessed with the idea that codes of conduct are a "scourge" (except, I guess, the Christian nationalist sqlite CoC), uses the r-slur with abandon, and fucking fawns over fashware.

No, not going to link, I don't promote fascist propaganda, but it's not fucking hard to look up. He's not shy about his opinions.

@rriemann @wwahammy if a law says I have to doxx my neighbour if they say the word "tangent", you bet your tush I'm not conplying with it  legal doesn't mean moral, and complying with a law is always a choice  (it's especially a choice when they're are consequences)
@rriemann wow, imagine, this opinion coming from a user of chaos dot social 😯
@wwahammy explain to me what did he do? he's against the stupid age verification shit too.
@wwahammy also, linux is missing love too. accessibility stack lags behind even NVDA 2016.x
@wwahammy @glyph upside of this pr seems to be a lot of people getting to call bullshit on the very idea that "age verification" is needed as an os service
@wwahammy he's a libertarian and the past couple years have been very instructive with regards to how people with his politics react to fascist violence when it's aimed at groups besides their own (ie they shrug or side with the fash outright)

@jplebreton @wwahammy

they shrug or side with the fash outright

We've got a word for such a person actually. It's ‘fascist’.