https://koronkevi.ch/posts/humanity.html
@regehr @atsuzaki @koronkebitch I am under no illusions that Canada or NZ are perfect countries, but many citizens are well treated by these countries, and they have net positive effects on the world scale. Partly because they are not the hegemon, they don't have to do some of the dirty work.
But an important question is how the most vulnerable are treated, and both Canada and NZ have historically failed some populations quite drastically.
@regehr @koronkebitch John you meet Pavel regularly—has he not evangelized the gospel of blog-first-revise-later to you? I sent him a Slack message once and he as like, PUT THIS ON YOUR BLOG RIGHT NOW.
He wasn’t wrong; I get the most organic traffic to that page by a wide margin.
@koronkebitch I agree a lot. I kind of care about the problems we're solving, but also about who it is. On the other hand, I do not like to say who invented a thing in class, in part because the demographics can be discouraging, and in part because it can be disappointing to have heroes.
There is a Māori whatataukī (or proverb):
He aha te mea nui o te ao
What is the most important thing in the world?
He tangata, he tangata, he tangata
It is the people, it is the people, it is the people
@koronkebitch But also, like, when talking to someone at a conference, one often asks what they're working on. Maybe that's not the most interesting thing in their life right now?
Still---if it's someone you don't know, it's a safe thing to ask about.
@koronkebitch ❤️❤️❤️
I'm also in it for the people and always have been. The ideas are also cool, but it's mostly about the people who have them. I'm pretty sure that in the end, only people and relationships matter.
@koronkebitch > writing little HTML web pages, but I quickly got bored of this and didn't even manage to create even a single website.
The most relatable sentence ever written
> Yes, I realize that my own field started as a way of automating and making logical arguments "objective" under some system.
some parts of cs yes, but i see pl specifically as very human oriented. it's making the tool (the computer) actually usable by humans. like how do we preserve the predictable and fast nature of electronic circuits but also make it something humans can do human things with. (the "preserving" part requires a lot of formalisms and proofs and all that, but the proof is only useful in that it allows you to confidently write correct doc/specs which is for humans.)
it's really telling that the answer to automate the human part of writing software is "use something which approximates a human-like behaviour (language)". (a bit like if the way to make a mechanical piano was to make a pair of mechanical hands.)
anyway, love the blogpost
@koronkebitch I really liked this. And I agree with it.
The people are why I got into, and stuck with, what I do.
My biggest worry is that the people who made me love it are the same people who are starting to make me not love it.
That's why I'm happy here on Mastodon with the PL and compiler folks, even if I'm just hanging out, looking in the window.