This is an important read about commitment and identity with respect to the work you do. Although not everyone will have underlying illnesses the fallout can be as severe.

Looking back at my academic career I see many parallels in the "costs" mentioned:

- sold my twenties to institutes/labs
- traveled too much
- gave too much of myself away (for free)
- strain on mental health

https://kennethreitz.org/essays/2026-03-18-open_source_gave_me_everything_until_i_had_nothing_left_to_give

#academicchatter #academia

Open Source Gave Me Everything Until I Had Nothing Left to Give

I thought I was having a spiritual awakening. I was having a psychiatric emergency. I was at a tech conference in Sweden when it started. I hadn't slept in...

Kenneth Reitz

@koen_hufkens oof, harrowing.

"I would have kept my identity separate from my projects." - great advice for past me (and probably a lot of PhD candidates). It was a tough lesson to learn that equating academic success (or lack thereof) with my identity was a bad move.

@michcampbell @koen_hufkens

...this is tough in academia. I was *great* at separating my identity from my research work, set boundaries - and that was an issue. "You are not serious enough"

I understand, and have seen, that entire essay. Its also been me, trying to find work and fuck. I'm *still* doing a paper review for zero money as in not paid in any way shape or form.

Anyway yes, work is work. Life is life. No matter how tempting, keep a boundary. Even if you love the work.

@adamsteer @michcampbell @koen_hufkens I set boundaries early on, which my PHD supervisor respected and encouraged, but someone else on my committee did not. They ended up writing a comment on one of my papers! It is not necessary to be on all the time.
@DrEvanGowan @adamsteer @michcampbell I was lucky still in many ways, because generally I had a good time. As long as the fun bit balanced the work this was alright. But looking back now, I think I could have balanced things better still at some points.
@DrEvanGowan @adamsteer @michcampbell And in the later years, being senior I was a strong believer of this and indeed the responsibility of a PI to make this abundantly clear.

@koen_hufkens @DrEvanGowan @michcampbell

My advisors / colleagues (they were the same, I'd been working in the group for years and also publishing...) were OK. I was growing a family and pioneering remote PhDing at the time. It was hitting a broader group where that approach of "not serious enough" came in.

Later, as a mentor / leader in field science - what's the first thing we do? be safe have fun. Not so appreciated in the senior seniorship (again, not serious enough!)

@adamsteer @koen_hufkens @DrEvanGowan

Have fun, look cool, be safe.

Some people take it all too seriously. In our one precious life we're not meant to have fun? Crazy attitude to have!

@michcampbell @koen_hufkens @DrEvanGowan

yeah safety third. After looking good and having fun.

It's what you tell clients after HR isn't listening!

And yeah. For polar fieldwork especially! *approved fun* only.... Not making life generally awesome while you're out skiing about collecting data on places no human has even been, or will ever be again...

We were actually criticised for that: "you just want to go skiing".

Well yes, we also have way more training and safety stuff etc etc...