a) system76 folks are trying to give exceptions for open source software
b) afaik, california and colorado laws may only require a field, but alabama, utah, and NY, seem to require full verification, so, how will that be
i hate this timeline
@navi i wonder who’s responsible for not providing a field like this if it happens. the distro? the software as a product? the dev team?
considering how this industry looks in general… nihil novi. I wish OSS was about resistance, but apparently the major players are all about compliance. A Fucking Shame.
I predicted the storm, as well as a systemd-aged, as well as the #GDPR angle, over a fortnight ago. It took less than a day from my post for the first person, in reply, to propose an actual such #AgeVerification dæmon.
https://mastodonapp.uk/@JdeBP/116156028746782578
This clearly model legislation is also slightly different in different states, as at least two legislatures amended the original bill. Which is going to cause further problems.
I've just had a very brief glance at the pull request. I even predicted the chosen implementation mechanism of JSON User Records.
This must make me a #systemd influencer. (-:

Stores the user's birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc. The xdg-desktop-portal project is addi...