LA Times is lobbying hard for "regime change"... in California. 😡

(pushing an Oath Keeper/MAGA candidate, even)

#USpol #LATimes #journalism

@ai6yr I get the feeling they're trying to make it more interesting than it will be. Very clickbaity. CA is not electing Sean Penn in One Battle After Another as its governor, there's just no way.

@ai6yr I'd hate to see it, but "give the other guys a chance" is a strong factor among the less politically connected or informed. It dovetails with their lack of interest.

Of course on a national scale Democrats benefit from this on this cycle.

Informed 🤝 Uninformed for change.

@ai6yr Ugh. If that happens, I probably have to flee CA 😔

@ai6yr

The media apparatus has decided that political disruption generated traffic to be monetized, so since it flows to the bottom line, ignore the externalized costs to their audience or profession.

@ai6yr

If it is not progressive, it will be conservative.

I have been saying this for years because I understand that the voting mentality, wants, and needs of the population have changed. To spell it out: if you're a wishy-washy moderate, you're unelectable — only people who focus on politics instead of people believe otherwise.

The Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, is one of those wishy-washy moderates — or, as I call them, corporate conservative Democrats. This is the man, for example, who wants to add age verification in every OS (operating system), including Linux. That is not the only problem with him, but it is the most recent one I can recall. The point is, he is not a progressive, and he is not going to win reelection.

Many people don't vote anymore. I do, I assume you do, and perhaps many people on the Fediverse do — but many don't. My sister and her husband, for example, don’t. I sometimes question the value of doing so if the end result is the same. Yes, I said the same — and we can argue about the differences, because there are differences — but at the end of the day, we still end up in the same place we don’t want to go. The only difference is whether we get there fast or slow.

MAGA is simply awful — there is no denying that — but they are giving their supporters exactly what they want. Meanwhile, you have a wishy-washy moderate who will work with these people while claiming unity is more important than change or accountability. So ultimately, we go down that same path by different means, and that’s the path we want to avoid.

People argue that we have to block that awful outcome — but block what? We're still going there. These people will compromise with Nazi pedophiles and tell us it is for the good of the country. And so many people no longer feel enthusiastic or motivated to support any of this.

And we know “next time” is a lie that never comes. It’s what they told my grandpa his whole life, and he passed away at 103 years old waiting for that make-believe “next time.” My parents are in their 70s and late 60s, I’m in my 40s, most people's kids are in their 20s, and the next generation to come is being told the same lie. We’ve all caught on by now.

We need someone who truly is one of us and represents the will of the people. The will of the people is both conservative and progressive at this time in history. Conservatives are being told they can have exactly what they want — when they want it, how they want it — and those corporate conservative Democrats, who are not progressive, will give it to them because they claim unity is more important than change and accountability.

If it is not progressive, it will be conservative. I guarantee it.

@ai6yr I haven’t read the article, but there is a very real chance that due to the number of Democrats and the lack of any front runner, the 2 Republicans end up as the top 2 even though the Dems combined got 65+% of the vote. And this wouldn’t even be the first time it has happened in CA, just the first time for the Governor.

I just hope that this scare will lead them to adopt a better voting system… like ranked choice, preferably with multi-member districts… (one can dream, right)