@coleenwalter I think we fail to want to see in animals what we see as defining features of ourselves. Panskeep spent a decade or more studying animal emotion - and warned that this was pointless by others - in order to then study human emotion. We share 6 basic emotional systems with animals, one of which is the rage circuit ...
You can see in dog eyes that there is a lot of sentience. That tends to correlate with thinking.
@coleenwalter Thanks. Much of modern life and dialogue tends to be trapped in habits I feel.
Education systems do not help - they strait jacket children rather than expand and evolve them.
I have many dialogues with AI regarding the mind. Many very interesting responses. Recent one is how we do not consciously think - that thinking is the role of the subconscious. What we call thinking is enabling steering and vetting that thinking.
@coleenwalter Understood.
I talk with people wherever I go as I might have mentioned. Often, after an amazing connection, it occurs to me that a repeat meeting with this person would not be the same.
We need not attach to words or events or people quite as much as we might feel we should.
Mostly - some like partners that is different of course.