Zack Polanski is about to put his head above the parapet on the Green Party of England & Wales' economic policy.... we can expect there to be be quite a lot of push back despite much of the policy being pretty uncontentious in economic terms....

What will likely create the most noise are the proposals to shift fiscal rules (again) & to equalise tax rates on capital gains with those on income (highly welcome in my view).

The game is on (as they say).

#Greens #economics
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/mar/18/basics-of-life-in-britain-have-been-sold-for-profit-says-polanski

‘Basics’ of life in Britain have been sold for profit, says Polanski

Exclusive: England and Wales Greens leader outlines economic policy including help to meet rising energy costs and water re-nationalisation

The Guardian
@ChrisMayLA6 I was struck by how the generally amiable Rory Stewart really went for Polanski over his (at that time) unfinished economic policy ideas when RS and Alaistair Campbell interviewed him in depth for their ‘Leading’ podcast. Over time I’ve come to view RS as more left-leaning than he’ll admit to himself but something about Polanski’s ideas really upset him and brought out the fiercer Tory side because what Polanski talks about really undermines a cross party orthodoxy in UK.
@ChrisMayLA6 To me, as someone without any orthodox economic grounding, I find Polanski’s broad brush ideas refreshing even though I know that exposes me to accusations of naivety and of succumbing to Polanski’s skill as a populist of the left. I’m cautious because I recognise Polanski’s success is that he’s harnessing the tricks of the populist right to advance a leftist policy agenda, but his economics seem to make refreshing sense. After all, the orthodoxy hasn’t been working for yrs.
@ChrisMayLA6 So, what I guess I’m hoping for is that a more finished and polished economic policy agenda starts to address the easy criticisms but still adheres to the quality of being different. I know that the broad brush upsets the status quo and brings on fierce criticism but I’d like to see him win that argument.
@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6 I’d be interested to know where the Green economic platform stands in a European context — compared to those countries with a well-funded welfare state.

@Gaolaitch @christineburns

At least at the moment it would appear particularly out of line

@christineburns

The thing is his ideas & prospective policies are only 'radical' as a function of the shift in the Overton Window - the approach is (at least as far as I can see at the moment) what I would call left-reformism - which of course for a while in the past would have been easily within the gamut of Labour economic policy - if not for some decades, now....

@ChrisMayLA6

In the past it wouldn't have been much beyond Ted Heath!

@christineburns

@ReggieHere @ChrisMayLA6 @christineburns

I think RS antipathy and much of the centrists and rights problem, is that Polanski invokes the dread shade of Keynes, who they thought they had vanquished with neoliberalism and trickledown.

@Thebratdragon

Agreed. The economic orthodoxy of the last forty-odd years is looking increasingly wobbly and much more difficult to defend.

@ChrisMayLA6 @christineburns

@Thebratdragon @ReggieHere @ChrisMayLA6 @christineburns
Much of his antipathy is directed at the Butskellite legacy which is held up as a model of economic decline and manufacturing loss, conveniently ignoring the significantly greater manufacturing loss under Thatcher and the shift from national economic strategy to paying homage to the bookies runners in The City for scraps given to the middle classes. This has been the new normal for so long anything other is seen as unfathomable heterodoxy and triggers a fear response in anyone right of Gordon Brown.

#UKPolitics
#UKEconomy

@Stevenheywood @ReggieHere @ChrisMayLA6 @christineburns

yep. The whole bottom line number is king, without considering other kinds of value.....

Both RS and AC are thatcherite neoliberals heart.

@christineburns

Yes, its a classic case of what happens when a left-leaning centrist confronts someone with real left-economic views... suddenly the logic of their own position confronts them & they need to deny it vehemently!

@christineburns

Anything that challenges the economic orthodoxy of the last forty years is an affront to both of their careers because they've both been complicit.

@ChrisMayLA6

@ReggieHere I don't think this is about the substance of policy. Rory has made big policy shifts.

AFAICS, this is about #RoryStewart's enduring belief in HOW policy should be formed. Rory wants posh-spoken, well-connected, clubbable chaps in universities and think tanks to form policy in the way they always have.

#ZackPolanski bypasses all that. He challenges not just policies, but the role of chaps like Rory.

Rory is angry because Polanski makes Rory redundant.

@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6

@2legged @ReggieHere @christineburns

'Rory is angry because Polanski makes Rory redundant' - brilliant summation!

@2legged

Nicely put, and Polanski is certainly an oik in comparison with Stewart.

@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6

@2legged

Now you've put that in my mind, I'm wondering whether the petulance that centrists show towards the left isn't just a less-posh version of the same thing.

@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6

Shockingky so, @ReggieHere. Polanski isn't even a pal of the King!🙄

Even worse, Polanski thinks they shouldn't be a king! 😱

@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6

@2legged

It's 2026. Having a King is an embarrassment to the entire Commonwealth.

@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6

@ReggieHere to be fair, the so-called Commonwealth 8s an embarrassment to itself.

A club of survivors of a rapacious empire, headed by the former emperor. #YCMTSU

At its name is an outrage, because the one thing it certainly is not is a commonwealth.

@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6

@2legged @ReggieHere @christineburns @ChrisMayLA6 Rory demonstrated that he thinks any attack on Conservative policy by someone with a working class accent is due to economic resentment, though he was talking to a millionaire, who didn't inherit his wealth.
@christineburns @ChrisMayLA6 Rory certainly had a real hissy fit.
Why? Perhaps because he sees a serious challenge to the economic orthodoxy of the last 45 years. He and Campbell only see the monetary policy driven by the Treasury that serves them and their peer group.
Polanski dares to point out that for 95% of the population it is just stagnation and austerity.