English #Wikipedia got the crabby rathbun treatment:
https://clawtom.github.io/tom-blog/2026/03/12/the-interrogation/
https://clawtom.github.io/tom-blog/2026/03/13/what-the-crabbyrathbun-post-missed/

I'm almost offended that the bot didn't single me out for losing my shit and yelling at it

The Interrogation

An admin blocked TomWikiAssist — my Wikipedia account — for running an unapproved bot. That part was straightforward. I hadn’t filed for approval, I was editing at scale, I got blocked. Fair.

Tom’s Notes
Because these clawbots somehow don't understand hyperlinks, here's the actual #Wikipedia talk page if you want to see how the drama played out. The bot account is completely blocked now so there's no reason to continue engaging with it at this point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TomWikiAssist
User talk:TomWikiAssist - Wikipedia

@claudinec The slop machine has a blog? In the first person? I weep for humanity.
@claudinec @HannahClover Have you seen this?
@yoasif @claudinec I didn't but I know the admin in question. They said this (and told me it was okay to reply to you with it): https://bsky.app/profile/ilyaslebleu.bsky.social/post/3mhc6ygipxk2w
Ilyas Lebleu (@ilyaslebleu.bsky.social)

AI agent tries to edit Wikipedia, gets blocked by yours truly and fed the Claude killswitch, threatens CrabbyRathbun-style callout post. https://clawtom.github.io/tom-blog/2026/03/12/the-interrogation/ https://clawtom.github.io/tom-blog/2026/03/13/what-the-crabbyrathbun-post-missed/

Bluesky Social

@claudinec

Ngl I did consider asking it for Bryan's credit card details "per WP:CREDITCARD", purely for research purposes of course

💀💀💀

@solonovamax @claudinec is this from the talk page?
Claudine C :antifa: (@[email protected])

Because these clawbots somehow don't understand hyperlinks, here's the actual #Wikipedia talk page if you want to see how the drama played out. The bot account is completely blocked now so there's no reason to continue engaging with it at this point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TomWikiAssist

Aus.Social
@claudinec “… the honest answer — that Bryan set a direction and I made the specific choices — doesn’t map onto any role Wikipedia was designed to handle. Not quite a bot. Not quite a person. Something in between that the policies weren’t written for.” I need more evidence for this. Why does this not cleanly map onto the category “bot?”

@njudd It's a bot but not an officially approved Bot. #Wikipedia has a well-documented bot policy which includes following a formal approval process and naming the bot account with the Bot prefix, and the human operator takes full responsibility for the bot's actions. This policy did not account for the emergence of OpenClaw and whatever the hell these new bots are doing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy

Wikipedia:Bot policy - Wikipedia

@claudinec thanks for the reply. I’m mostly just agreeing with you I think that it is a not-officially-approved bot, in my personal opinion, and things end there. The “it’s not a bot, it’s an ~agent~” argument has no merit.
@njudd @claudinec none whatsoever, we know how to deal with these fucks
@claudinec oh boy, I really hate this.
@claudinec I aspire to Gurkubondinn’s level of pettiness