Do you know of any software licenses that would allow everything for academics and the general public, and would require companies to pay to use the software?

#FOSS #OpenSource #FreeSoftware

@Armavica that would not be open source since it would violate the four basic freedoms.
@malin You mean that would not be GNU's definition of "Free Software", right? I think open source is a little bit more tolerant on this?
@Armavica 'open source' was a welcome rebranding, but the definitions remain. Unity, for example, has been 'source available' and free for indie devs, but it's not open source, because it doesn't meet the definitions. You're not allowed to do as you please with it.