Nicolas MØUART🤯 > Solve this puzzle.
🤖 (Qwen3.5 35B A3B) > "Wait — the puzzle says “Solve this puzzle” — but doesn’t specify what to solve."
db@silentexception With Qwen3.5:397b, to the prompt "Solve the puzzle given in the picture." it gave :
... (1 500 chars) ...
Conclusion: Since the question is missing, there is no single "answer." However, if this were an analogy puzzle (e.g., "A is to B as C is to..."), the answer would be D, because the relationship is "move the white square up." Similarly, if the analogy was "A is to C as B is to...", the answer would also be D (relationship: "move the white square left").
db
@dblas Sûrement la limite des LLMs ou pourquoi Yann LeCun parle IA physique (Physical AI).
@silentexception Je pense que Yann Le Cun parlait plutôt de robots (voitures autonomes, équations physiques, relations interpersonnelles, etc) à opposer aux modèles purement statistiques. Or, la statistique peut parfaitement mentir (suffit que le jeu de données soit pourri), la physique ne ment pas, elle.
Mais elle est parfois difficile à interpréter : mécanique de Newton/mécanique relativiste.
db
Mais elle est parfois difficile à interpréter : mécanique de Newton/mécanique relativiste.
db