🚨 Wide ranging powers to restrict Internet access in the UK have been voted through 🚨

Ministers will be able to impose digital ID checks, curfews and VPN restrictions without Parliamentary scrutiny.

This can be used on websites, social media, apps and games with no need to show there's any harm to children.

Find out more ⬇️

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/mps-give-ministers-powers-to-restrict-entire-internet/

#onlinesafety #digitalid #id #privacy #ageverification #freedomofexpression #ukpolitics #ukpol

MPs give ministers powers to restrict entire Internet

MPs have rejected a Lords amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill that would allow a social media ban for under 16s.

Open Rights Group

“This broad amendment takes power away from [UK] parliament and Ofcom and hands it to ministers. The consequence of this would be every adult having to provide their personal data, or use their body and biometric features as a key to unlock the Internet."

It doesn't address the structural causes of online harms and can be used to restrict content ideologically.

🗣️ @JamesBaker

#onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #ageverification #freedomofexpression #ukpolitics #ukpol

@openrightsgroup @JamesBaker Alternately users could abandon all UK-hosted and UK-compliant websites, and use only the darknet and noncompliant sites such as noncompliant Mastodon servers which will always exist.

The only counter to this is ID require to obtain SIM cards and landline connections, with existing SIMs cancelled unless registered with ID. Mexico was forced by noncompliance to abandon an attempt to do this.

VPN controls won't work either, non-UK based VPNs will ignore ID requirements and the malicious "free" ones certainly will. Then there's Tor, which they cannot block without blocking their own military's use of it.

The UK cannot afford to copy the Great Firewall of China, which is labor-intensive to run from what I hear and leaks like a sieve when facing determined opponents,

I think the "legal" Internet will become largely deserted except for shopping in large parts of the world.

I have yet to see an age verifiication prompt from any site even when accessing porn from inside Florida, again due to mass noncompliance.

@LukefromDC @openrightsgroup It essentially pushes anyone who doesn’t want to provide personal data to a third party to those spaces. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/social-media-ico-protect-children-b2936462.html today they are trying to expand age gates by saying platforms need to check people aren’t under 13.
Watchdogs call on big tech to ‘urgently’ do more to protect children online

The regulators accused tech platforms of ‘failing to put children’s safety at the heart of their products’

The Independent

@JamesBaker @openrightsgroup A big limiting factor the age verification thugs face on under-13 is that fact that few 13 year olds have government-issued ID. In the US, teens who do not drive or have a bank account may not have any sort of ID either.

Asking for school ID's leave out those who are homeschooled, have dropped out, or go to private schools that do not issue ID.

If they try that anyway, a false ID claiming to have been issued by a school that does not exist may be legal on the grounds that it is not a counterfeit of anyone else's document

@LukefromDC @openrightsgroup The fact there aren’t many ways to prove age at 13 is true. Here in the U.K. I’d worry that was going to become a manufactured reason why we now needed the Government Digital ID system.

@JamesBaker @openrightsgroup What I am hoping happens is that the corporate/ad supported social media sites all choke on this age verification crap, followed by a mass migration to platforms beyond the reach of the offending governments.

I normally pursue "counter-law enforcement" strategies to defeat shit like this, as the political process seems to be bought and paid for. In this case, its all about creating, then expanding "no-go zones" for online law enforcement.