@KoHoSo People seriously need to calm down on the anti-Ai crusade.

Yes, there are lots of ethical and moral reasons why to stay away from AI. It requires a lot of energy, impacting the energy production demand which in the end can impact the environment. Yes, this is bad. And a reasonable argument against AI.

But the people on the barricades wanting full transparency on whether a code change was made by LLM or not, that is nonsense. Open source code can be audited by anyone interested. Judge for yourself if the change is good or not. As long as generated code has been properly peer-reviewed, it doesn't matter who or what wrote the code. The code was accepted as good.

Where it makes sense to highlight LLM involvement is when the code audit/review is done entirely by LLM. LLMs can help review code, but it should not have the final say.

If LLM has been used for coding has very little to say as long as a skilled human has been involved in the process, in regards to the code outcome.

But don't mix in the moral/ethics part into why LLMs shouldn't be used for coding. Those two aspects are two very different discussions. That is as pointless as to say we can't use roads initially built for cars when biking, because the intension of the road was for car usage.

LLM use in code is a technology debate. The ethics/moral aspects of AI use is a political discussion.