"If you want to improve the model's output, you can write skill files with more specific instructions!"
"Oh wow so like a file that tells the computer to do exactly what you want?"
"Yep!"
"You're never gonna believe this."
"If you want to improve the model's output, you can write skill files with more specific instructions!"
"Oh wow so like a file that tells the computer to do exactly what you want?"
"Yep!"
"You're never gonna believe this."
The imperium is actually super-against AI; but this seems like one of those "a small mind is easily filled with faith" situations they tell me about.
It's like people are desperately trying to extract deterministic behaviour from a stochastic rock.
@johnnyvibrant I was thinking this exact thing.
"Remember when the program/compiler/shell just actually did what your file told it to? What a trip that was!"
"you know what would be cool? a large vehicle that multiple people get on and it drives around to the same stops every 15 minutes"
"you mean a bus?"
It is about optimization.
You, being the coder, can provide a skill file telling the AI/LLM what it should do or not do. By providing the skill file, you are optimizing the model performance and trying to tell it what you want.
The same thing happens with real coding. You, being the coder, provide a source file to the compiler. The source file is a skill file that reflects the skill of your design and logic.
Your chances of getting the computer to do exactly what your want are much higher with the compiler.
(-o0 is a flag to the toolchain to compile for space saving at the machine code level as opposed to optimizing for speed. Sometimes, optimization for speed can result in subtle bugs. Rare)
@mttaggart that was 90% of all arguments I got when I told folks I don't use AI in my coding workflow directly.
Just write the specs
Have another AI review your PR
And they just don't seem to get the point that each AI step is error-prone and cannot be trusted.
If the makers of AI™ find out you can do this, they might bias the output in their favour.
Luckily they are too ethical to do this.
</sarcasm>