His comment sums things up pretty well, IMO.
https://www.ft.com/content/7cab4ec7-4712-4137-b602-119a44f771de
His comment sums things up pretty well, IMO.
https://www.ft.com/content/7cab4ec7-4712-4137-b602-119a44f771de
@LaChasseuse Velocity over quality has been a long-term trend.
Why do we need python virtualenvs and docker containers? Because nobody is willing to do the work to make their system libraries backward-compatible and keep track of breaking changes.
Why do we need kubernetes? Because nobody is willing to make their code stable, so they just automated the task of reinstalling it when it breaks.
Is there any way other than government regulation to reverse this?
Velocity is not a substitute for Quality.
Got it 🙂👍
@LaChasseuse the alt text has 3 occurrences of AI but instead of ai it is letters A and L
i don't personally use screen reader software, but i've recently set up filters to see less of the slop discourse, and this circumvents them
Agreed... But.. (also)
This was the inevitable outcome once 'manager' types decided that they were just going to move "prototyping" caliber 'technologies' into "prod" for the exact same reasons
A.K.A.
Enterprises deciding that "Making everything a (damn vulnerable) web app" was an acceptable choice was always going to lead to "the next 'thing'" being yet another exchange of "disregarding quality," in exchange for 'shipping things faster' but w/o:
- knowing how it works
- proper due diligence
- reliable documentation
While being full of vulnerabilities