Stephen FarrugiaMar 11
It’s incredible how rich the well of AI critique is. Every day I come on here and read new, nuanced, takes that make perfect sense. Meanwhile the boosters seem to be working from the same pitch deck since day one.
Show threadWulfy—Speaker to the machinesMar 11

@fasterandworse

Funny how our perspectives differ, I see the #antiai rhetoric increasingly departing reality.
Because the antagonists never use #Ai, at least consciously, they construct their own mythology. Which truth be told, is sometimes funny.

IMHO It's counter productive because activism to be credible, needs to be based on facts.

Show threadJames Fairbairn

@n_dimension @fasterandworse “a friend” wrote this and I think it might be a bad take, but it also highlights one dimension in which critics willfully disengaging from AI makes it more likely that we end up with regulation that concentrates power

https://open.substack.com/pub/theassumedreal/p/fine-ill-write-about-ai

Fine, I’ll Write About AI

Hidden inside the "AI safety" and regulation debate is a threat to computational freedom.

The Assumed Real
Mar 11 at 8:15pmWeb
Show threadWulfy—Speaker to the machinesMar 11

@james @fasterandworse

My initial scan shows its actually not a bad article.
I will examine this post in greater detail when I have more time. Thanks for the link!

Show threadJames FairbairnMar 11
@n_dimension lmk what you think!
Show threadWulfy—Speaker to the machinesMar 12

@fasterandworse @james

I really liked this article.
It avoided the tribalism of #Ai good/bad
And focused on what's important.

What's the right way to #regulateAI

Its about computational freedom!