@davidgerard @katrinatransfem there is something fishy about the most recent influencer campaign. They even got Knuth to mention a specific product by name.
It's like they did psychological profiling on individuals, and then give them exactly what they need to praise them, and not their competitor (and of course push the concept as a whole bit only secondarily).
@loke @Mae @davidgerard @katrinatransfem My working hypothesis is that with the 4.6 model they made Claude better... at manipulating people
And we're seeing the results of that
@sitcom_nemesis @loke @Mae @katrinatransfem Writing a post/podcast on that is in my list for this week. Trouble is how to nail it down, rather than just my vibes on the topic.
given the tremendous number of social media posts from formerly competent developers and the paucity of non-shit results, i'm pretty sure this is the answer
but proving or even demonstrating it is rather more work and i need the material

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]>
@Canine3625
Yes, in that context even the broad concept of reading “reading” can be considered deterministic.
@Canine3625 @sitcom_nemesis @davidgerard @loke @Mae @katrinatransfem
This was my my favourite take.
@sitcom_nemesis @davidgerard @loke @Mae @katrinatransfem
every time you use an LLM for *anything*, it makes your brain a tiny bit smoother
@sitcom_nemesis @davidgerard @loke @Mae @katrinatransfem it requires a cognitive shift to go into tool use mode rather than the assumption that all engineering is now using the natural language part of the brain to argue with the rationalisation engine.
I know. Yes. I don’t like it either. Do you want cognitive decay? Because that’s how you get cognitive decay.
@davidgerard @sitcom_nemesis @loke @Mae @katrinatransfem Interesting information here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk0hIOAwf6M
Interestingly polls show devs have been trusting AI tools less since 2024, not more, strongly contradicting the narrative that it's improving and has turned a corner.

@loke seems to me that respected people in the field and overworked maintainers of structural open source projects would be juicier (and less conspicuous) targets right now.
@loke @Mae @davidgerard @katrinatransfem https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/google-microsoft-pay-creators-500000-and-more-to-promote-ai.html
I have a hunch (no evidence) that they're also using platforms like mechanical turk to lay astroturf. AI companies are very used to paying people in the global south slave wages for data labeling. Why wouldn't they do the same for marketing?