If Windows is the blocker, what stops OEMs from pushing Linux?
@atomicpoet good question. There has been a steady increase in manufacturers that have pre-installed Linux options over the years. I think MS must be pressuring the manufacturers behind the scenes with Windows license pricing if they become too Linux-friendly.
I would personally love to have an arm64 Linux laptop that "just works". While there have been arm64 Windows laptops for a long time, they are still a rarity. Maybe that's because of all the proprietary legacy apps that only work on x86.
@atomicpoet a friend of mine sent me a link to this the other day.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1947825-REG/asus_gz302eac_xs99_13_4_republic_of_gamers.html
It's a gaming laptop that is built like an MS Surface Pro, but runs a Ryzen AI Max 395+ for the CPU. It's not ARM, but at least it is something different.
I know Windows has been working on true ARM support for a long time. But I think they're in a tight spot, because if they start supporting ARM what difference is a desktop versus a laptop versus a mobile device? Honestly, I think that's already a valid question when you compare the high-end iPad over the lower end and laptops. Heck, the newest laptop announcement is a device that is technically cheaper than even the iPad Mini.
I think you're right, they need to catch up. They're just going to take some time to do it because of marketing and image 😞
I've got a LENOVO Chromebook Plus 14" with a MediaTek Kompanio Ultra 910 CPU. It's not Apple quick, but outpaces Intel Core Ultra 5 (115U/125U) processors in both performance and efficiency. It delivers up to 18% higher single-thread and 40% higher multi-thread performance.
Certainly feels very fast to use.
@atomicpoet There's also still a massive friction point with Linux and most software that isn't a web browser that people actually use. Word, Excel, etc.
Actual humans that aren't nerds are extremely friction-averse.
@atomicpoet I agree about the performance gap, but most of the folks using Windows-based notebooks haven't experienced the gap.
So the “good enough" experience they already have is their baseline. And they're unlikely to buy even Apple notebooks because of the whole friction thing, so they're not even terribly likely to experience the performance gap.
@atomicpoet Like for us it’s obvious how large the gap is between Apple-silicon notebooks and "other”. Especially when you're talking about performance-per-watt metrics. I have a Lenovo monstrosity gaming notebook that is super powerful, but I literally only use it plugged into the wall to play games because of how much power it uses. And I hate Windows so much that I don't use that machine for _anything_ else.
My M1 Pro MacBook Pro is _miles_ ahead of that thing in portable power.