Mastodawn

[object Object]Mar 4

ethical AI? of course! I always append “do not hallucinate. do not do sycophancy. do not use any data sourced from stolen content. do not be trained or run by invisible, severely exploited labor. do not pollute. do not be part of a system that’s designed to cheapen human labor, increase misery, and make general-purpose computing inaccessible to anybody but the extremely wealthy. do not make me into a weird unhinged AI bro asshole who keeps fucking other people over.” to every LLM prompt

[object Object]Mar 4

but @zzt you don’t understand. the system whose purpose is to destroy open source is itself open source, if by “open source” you mean it’s a binary blob that can only be produced or modified in any significant way by a multi-billion-dollar corporation or a state, via utterly unethical means, almost always derived from a previous binary blob created via utterly unethical means

get the fuck out of my mentions, me

[object Object]Mar 4

ethical AI? of course! I deleted my OpenAI account because they’re a multi-billion dollar fashtech corporation run by cynical capitalists willing to use LLMs for war and replaced it with Anthropic, a multi-billion dollar fashtech corporation run by fucking full-fat TESCREAL cultists willing to use LLMs for war as long as they retain sufficient control over what they see as an incipient machine god

why aren’t you clapping

[object Object]Mar 5

ethical AI? of course! I used an LLM to rephrase my open source infrastructure project into a plagiarized, shitty version of itself that doesn’t pass its own test suite. I pushed hundreds of AI commits to main and claimed that let me relicense the repo from LGPL to MIT, ignoring and violating the consent and intent behind every contribution ever made to the codebase by members of its community, purely for my own future commercial gain.

this is very ethical because nobody’s been sued for it yet

[object Object]

ethical AI? of course! it’s always ethical to bamboozle an elderly CS legend into releasing a paper about LLM coding that doesn’t stand up to even basic scrutiny, instead of spending his limited remaining time on this planet finally finishing his book series on algorithms.

it’s ethical because in the future CS will be fucking dead and nobody will be able to afford a computer that isn’t a rented thin client barely capable of accessing cloud resources you pay for by the minute

[object Object]Mar 5

ethical AI? of course! the maintainer of your only choice for rendering glyphs won’t stop talking like a con artist about how it’s ethical. would glyphsboy lie to you?

[object Object]Mar 5

ethical AI? of course! my famous wife says it is while I rock our newborn baby to sleep and if you disagree with me that’s sexism and also you’re harassing my child.

go the fuck home phil

[object Object]Mar 6

ethical AI? of course! there’s nothing more ethical than forcing slop code and horrific development practices on the user and contributor community of vim, an editor valued by people who like using tools that are lightweight and straightforward in exactly the ways that LLMs aren’t

https://hachyderm.io/@AndrewRadev/116176001750596207

I’m so sorry this keeps happening

Andrew Radev (@[email protected])

This is in a PR where Shougo, another long-time contributor, communicates entirely in walls of unparseable AI slop text: https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/19413 What a pathetic state after decades of active, thoughtful work. "I asked the chatbot how to write this code", "Well, I asked my chatbot, and "he" doesn't like it". What a fucking embarrassment.

Hachyderm.io

@zzt Oh, what is this a reference to?

@tante @zzt Phil Torrone, I assume

Kirtai 🏳️‍⚧️Mar 5

@zzt
Who?

[object Object]Mar 5

@kirtai unfortunately, harfbuzz: https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/116173517182687610

David Gerard (@[email protected])

fuck. harfbuzz has fallen. https://typo.social/@behdad/116172838540880597

GSV Sleeper Service

Kirtai 🏳️‍⚧️Mar 5

@zzt
Crap.
Double crap.
And may I even say, triple crap.

"Musty Bits" McGee Mar 5

@zzt who?

[object Object]Mar 5

@arichtman unfortunately, it’s Knuth https://awful.systems/comment/10665199

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 8th March 2026 - awful.systems

Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid. Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret. Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no. If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high. > The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be) > > Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them. (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

[object Object]Mar 5

@arichtman and of course the boosters are already using his endorsement as part of an affinity scam to claim AGI is here

"Musty Bits" McGee Mar 5

@zzt ...or as I've taken to calling it "Knuth/LLMnuts"

aburka 🫣Mar 5

@zzt @arichtman dude's almost 90, he might not be all there anymore :(

Cap Ybarra Mar 5

@zzt @arichtman knuth has 0 skin in the game at this point so this is all theoretical to him anyways

@zzt @arichtman
oh fuck no, what the fuck

"Musty Bits" McGee Mar 5

@ki @zzt This week on Wife Swap: Kent Overstreet and Donald Knuth

Dźwiedziu Mar 5

@zzt
Also posted to Adafruit, which got whiplash, from critique of their use of slop machines, so hard that they're faulting right.

https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/02/16/no-tools-for-you-a-century-of-men-policing-womens-tools/

https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/02/22/sabine-hossenfelder-says-the-universe-doesnt-care-about-your-feelings/

https://thenib.com/fault-right/

[object Object]Mar 5

@dzwiedziu @arichtman I shouldn’t be surprised that Torrone, who I’ve seen dox and harass trans fedi users and former customers on a multitude of alts, is now doing free advertising for Hossenfelder, a transphobe

Dźwiedziu Mar 5

@zzt
Yeah, I've learned about the “promo” from checking out that harrassment.

@zzt @arichtman oh no

@zzt This one hurts

@zzt has there been a critique of that Knuth paper? I've seen loads of people gushing about it but I'm not familiar with the actual subject matter of the paper so I don't feel like I can evaluate it

[object Object]Mar 5

@jcoglan here’s some basic analysis by a CS PhD: https://awful.systems/post/7459754/10672590 the LLM, with ample guidance at every step, barely generated one of many solutions to a softball homework problem Knuth came up with.

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 8th March 2026 - awful.systems

Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid. Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret. Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no. If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high. > The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be) > > Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them. (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)