Quick question

Should OSM-data be charged a fee for when corporations use it?

(profit would go to OSM project)

#osm #openstreetmap #question #weekend #opinion

no, data is free for everyone
54.4%
yes, for corporate use
45.6%
Poll ended at .
@lokjo Bonus point: pay a billion fees if you don't put OSM credits

@lokjo #OSM should take the same line as the GNU General Public License (GPL), to quote RMS, "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy of the software."

So, if you want a full Planet file every 30S, **you** pay for the infrastructure.

@lokjo I'm surprised by how many people are talking about paying for data.
- it would increase scraping which hurts osm more because of increased server usage
- corporations might stop using osm and switch to something else. The more people/corps use osm data, the better
- the whole point of it being open is so that people can use it

@thibaultmol

The thing is, OSM data is ment for free usage, because it is compiled by volunteers, and to power everybody.

When a corporation uses it -and makes money with it- the result is not just that all volunteers become free workers for corporations, it also powers corporations to overtake those places of small companies again, and save €millions, which could have been invested in the OSM project.

@lokjo @thibaultmol And that's why there is a Corporate membership and other forms of support.

https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Corporate_Members

Corporate Members - OpenStreetMap Foundation

@mkyral @thibaultmol

Yes I know, I've wrote about that a while ago.

It's not good since 1) it's voluntairely, and 2) the highest membership fee for companies who have a "revenue in the hundreds of millions" is €30.000 per year, which is rediculously low.

@lokjo @mkyral
I agree only with the second point. Increasing that amount is probably going to be a rounding error for those companies

@thibaultmol @lokjo

The real question is: do OSMF need much more money? Are there any plans what to do with them? They can easily increase fee if needed (and agreed)

https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Finances

Also donations and membership fees are much better for foundation. You are not doing this for profit.

Finances - OpenStreetMap Foundation

@mkyral @lokjo the OSMF is criminally underfunded and has been for years...
It's only been since one or two years that there's an actual full-time person working on the server infrastructure...... Which is insane
@thibaultmol @lokjo OK, but this is responsibility of OSMF. They decide. Maybe they need just better leader. Someone who knows how to negotiate with big companies. How to properly handle Overture maps situation.

@mkyral @thibaultmol @lokjo Overture exists *because* the OpenStreetMap community rejected the “leadership” of those companies.

Just look at OSMF Board elections for the ca. 10 years beforehand. Constantly full of “I'll be the candidate for Facebook, and we should replace everything with AI, or we're dooomed!”

@amapanda @thibaultmol @lokjo Yes, I know. By better leader I don't mean someone working for big tech companies.
@lokjo The F in FOSS stands -as @rms has been telling us for the last 50 years- stands for Free, but not as in Free Beer.
@lokjo My answer would be we should find a way to ban corporations from using OSM data in any way, shape or form. Prefferably by delegalising corporations 🤟🤗

@lokjo I don't think this question is a good use of time.

The OSM licence allows corporations to use OSM data w/o a fee. I don't think you'll get the OSM community to do a licence change (again!) to block this.

Like it or not, corporations will always be allowed to use OSM data w/o a fee.