In a recent comparison of engagement around a Leave.X campaign post,[1] someone pointed out that a female journalist who is active in the feminist movement and critical of Big Tech had a very different experience than others.

The Mastodon post was shared twice, while the Bluesky version was shared over 200 times and received significantly more interactions. This raises questions about tech-savvy spaces like Mastodon and how they reflect broader societal issues.

For women on Mastodon:

Do you feel that the patriarchal dynamics and male behavior in this space, which is still largely dominated by white men, make it harder for women to participate?

#Mastodon #Diversity #Fediversity #Fediverse #Feminism #BlueSky #Inclusion

Totally agree
23.1%
Partially agree
36.1%
Partially disagree
21.3%
Totally disagree
19.5%
Poll ended at .

In case you know people who could contribute to this question, please, share or tag them.

[1] https://social.vivaldi.net/@everton137/116130824160901072

@everton137 wait maybe I'm missing something but, in this example I see the opposite, mastodon sharing it more than bluesky? or was that part about a different post
@anthropy someone commented about an opposite experience.

@everton137 ohh right, I misread the first part, makes sense, thanks.

I can't speak for the people you're trying to poll here (so I didn't vote), but if I am to personally guess, the lack of algorithm is a double edged thing, especially for smaller accounts, but also for larger ones; you have to (re-)boost your important takes a few times for them to actually reach your audience, as it may just end up piled under "background noise". tags also help there. Bluesky's Discover feed has an algorithm

@everton137 that said, I'm of course also very curious about the experiences of others, it'll be interesting to see what the results are.