New single: Skin head soldier?
New single: Skin head soldier?
White liberation
From fucking what?
During the Obama administration, some honkies felt every day was oppression. The FEMA camp conspiracies were off the chain.
Yet…here we are. Who made the camps now?
As usual, for entirely batshit crazy irrational reasons. These are the same people who prior to 9/11 worried about the “New World Oder” and UN Agenda 21 meaning that French troops in blue helmets would go door to door and take guns away from Americans. If there was a Polymarket back then, how many of these people would have bet their life savings every year on that outcome and been wrong every. single. time. And kept on betting on it year after year.
Then after the Patriot Act created DHS, FEMA became the boogeyman because it would be the conduit for executing emergency powers, and 9/11 was the first national emergency in the lives of most conspiracy nuts. Sort of like how ICE is the specific agency under DHS murdering people, DHS, other than PuppyKiller herself, is largely removed from the day-to-day operations of sub-agencies. I imagine there was also a certain racist stripe of “yes, we want homeland security…from brown people. Keep doing anything you want to them, that’s fine.” Then the discordant wish to not let FEMA get some Deep State cancer and Obama put all the Good Ol’ Boys in camps. Functionally, it makes no sense, but the same people think the President is a King or God, so who fucking knows.
Structurally, there was a basis in fact only so far as “this agency does things during emergencies.” Past that, it’s all to sell newsletters and books and tacticool powdered eggs. Combined with the fact that any new agency created in the US government immediately gets populated by idiots that wouldn’t get promoted if they stayed somewhere else, DHS and FEMA have consistently demonstrated significant ineptitude and being too slow-moving to do much in the way of dealing with an actual emergency. Under DHS, maaaybe CISA and the Coast Guard are/were competent and that’s about it. Meaning that anyone seriously fearing conspiracy-style “FEMA camps” for their NWO national roundup would have 6-18 months of lead time to know the camps are being built (poorly by the highest bidder) and maybe never even get done due to cost overruns.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk about Classic Conspiracy Nuts and you.

Edge - Jeffrey Epstein's favourite intellectual salon - was sold to me as a gathering of the world's finest minds, writes Virginia Heffernan. The files reveal it was something far darker: a decades-long project that cloaked eugenics, race science and sexual misconduct in Ivy League respectability
The percentage of the global population made up by white people has declined from 40% to 7% in like 50years. According to the definition of genocide by the UN that qualifies.
DEI policy has provided opportunity, employment, benefits etc to all minorities across the western world. That by definition requires the reallocation of those thing. Now who loses out in this situation (cos someone is losing out) turns out to be predominantly straight white men.
You can argue all u want that that they shouldn’t have had it in the first place but do you expect them to lie down and take it like good little bitches as u take their opportunity and future away from them?
I think people forget that it only takes a few young men (3.5% of the population) to for them to become the monopoly on violence and take power by force through suppression of everyone else. People do not turn the fascism cos they hate liberty they turn to fascism cos action by peaceful means has failed them.
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” - John F. Kennedy
The percentage of the global population made up by white people has declined from 40% to 7% in like 50years.
🤣🤣🤣
The world has never been 40% white. The world is not currently 7% white. Is this what PragerU is telling you? 🙄
1900 Wikipedia (citing historical demographers) states areas populated by European-descent people were 36% of world pop (~594M of 1.65B).
Today (2025, world ~8.2B): No UN global race data exists. Estimates for European-ancestry population: 800M–1.3B (10–16%), with ~8–12% common in stricter counts excluding mixes/immigrants.
I exaggerated a bit but the math checks out
Back in 1900, it wasn’t just European-descent that lived in Europe either. We were as multicultural back then as we are now. Travel has existed for a long time.
So what if other parts of the world had a bigger population growth? This isn’t a competition.
Your math doesn’t check out. It is just racist-baiting and full of backwards thinking.
There is only one race you should care about: the HUMAN race.
Everything thing else are variations that aren’t relevant.
Back in 1900, it wasn’t just European-descent that lived in Europe either. We were as multicultural back then as we are now. Travel has existed for a long time.
Yeah and not all people have 10 fingers. A good indicator that someone is either a moron or trying to intentionally mislead is when they use a small minority to try disprove a generalisation.
So what if other parts of the world had a bigger population growth? This isn’t a competition.
So you admit my numbers do hold validity?
There is only one race you should care about: the HUMAN race.
Yeah and I want all member of that race to be treated equally ie no free shit for your identity.
Your math doesn’t check out. It is just racist-baiting and full of backwards thinking.
The beautiful part of math is that u can objectively prove things vague claims it doesn’t check out without evidence is bullshit.
Why don’t you just pick yourself up by your bootstraps and not expect us to fix your sorry life for you?
Isn’t that the usual conservative view?
We don’t care about you. You have already shown to not have empathy for people with other melanin contents in their skin.
A normal person adds enough to society that they don’t have to pretend like skin colour is something important. You should try it sometime.
Racist are a cancer on the human race that should be cut out with a big knife.
If you’re getting the short end of the stick, you should be mad at the billionaires who are stealing from you.
But I’m sure you voted for Republicans because they successfully pointed your anger at black and Hispanic people instead.
Sure thing.
Dei: Their is a set quantity (with minor variations) of jobs, opportunities, wealth, etc. Those resources should be offered to the person most qualified ie egalitarianism. Dei by definition fails at doing this it reallocates resources from those who are most qualified to other people based on their identity (race, religion, sexuality etc) dei requires and thus enforces racism, sexism, homophobia etc, etc.
Immigration: Economics 101 outlines the laws of supply demand. Immigration increases the supply of labour and increases the demand on goods and services. Thus the value of labour drops and the value of goods and services increases. The end result of this is lower wages and higher cost of living. This is exactly what u want if you are part of the bourgeois ownership class and the opposite to what everyone else wants.
We have statistics to prove that immigrants commit higher levels of crime and cost more in terms of welfare.
That’s not to say I dislike all immigration as we can very easily tell from the statistics that certain classes of immigrants actually commit less crime and contribute more to economic prosperity.
If you study economics deeper than 101 you learn that supply-and-demand is mostly a fantasy in the modern age and the problem is oligarchal control and lack of regulations.
But both of your issues boil down to the same point: there are more people than there are useful jobs. The solution is not more jobs or fewer people, it’s decoupling productivity from food and housing. Anything else is admitting that a permanent underclass of jobless, homeless people must exist as an implicit threat against the working class if they get too uppity.
Also, immigrants commit less crime on average and get less in government benefits than citizens. Your “statistics” (that you did not even cite) are made up right-wing xenophobic propaganda.
If you study economics deeper than 101 you learn that supply-and-demand is mostly a fantasy in the modern age and the problem is oligarchal control and lack of regulations.
Your starting to sound like Marx here. You are right for a small subset of monopolised markets mainly due to regulations that are used to lock out competitors.
But both of your issues boil down to the same point: there are more people than there are useful jobs.
Yep
The solution is not more jobs or fewer people, it’s decoupling productivity from food and housing.
Yeah so let’s just reorganise society into a socialist paradise. We live under a capitalist system, under said system my argument holds. It is not your right to receive anything that requires the labour of another human being. It is not your right to require someone to go to work and make ur food for u or build ur house. Plus the classic argument against communist policy applies here why would I wanna be the guy farming or building houses when I could do nothing an get someone else to do it for me? Your system requires an underclass of slave labour be that robotic, human, or underpaid illegal immigrant.
Anything else is admitting that a permanent underclass of jobless, homeless people must exist as an implicit threat against the working class if they get too uppity.
Yeah people need a reason to contribute to society. I contribute cos its making me ungodly rich, granting me extreme liberty, and allowing me to build a better world for when I have children. But some people are lazy, useless, low intelligence imbeciles who need the threat of a low quality of life to give them to kick to get off their ass and do something for society. Which of course raises the question what is that minimum standard. I would say the minimum standard is u get a 3m*3m box with a bed, shitter and shower, u get 3 meals of engineered tasteless grey goo with plain water. Thats the bottom rung of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs taken care of anything more is on u.
Also, immigrants commit less crime on average and get less in government benefits than citizens. Your “statistics” (that you did not even cite) are made up right-wing xenophobic propaganda.
Wrong. Official DHS/ICE data shows 81,312 removable noncitizens arrested in FY2024 with prior convictions—totaling 57k assaults, 18k sex offenses, 12k homicides/manslaughters—highlighting a massive crime burden from illegal immigrants.On benefits: CIS analysis of 2024 Census SIPP data—immigrant-headed households use welfare at 53% (61% for illegal-headed) vs. 37% for native-born, draining billions in Medicaid/SNAP/EITC often via U.S.-born kids.These are from federal reports and Census surveys, not “propaganda.” Cite yours?
Lol no you’re not getting the short end of the stick.
I had more I now have less because what I used to have is being reallocated to other people who are less skilled/capable than myself.
Yes, DEI shouldn’t be a thing in an ideal world
Glad we agree
but we don’t live in an ideal world
So ur idea to fight systemaric bias is to introduce more systematic bias? That’s like saying the best way to defeat the systematic bias by the Nazis is to become a fascist regime and send all German citizens to concentration camps. That’s fucking insane.
and white privilege is still a thing basically anywhere in the world.
I’m not privileged cos I’m white I’m privileged cos my parents are well off and they got me highly educated, are involved in my life, care about me, love me, and I was born in Australia. None of that has anything to do with the colour of my skin. Unless ur implying that nonwhite people are poor, uneducated, and have unloving parents because of the colour of their skin. That’s racist as fuck bro.
No problem addressed by dei is caused by identity. I have no problem with socialised services for those who got unlucky. I have a problem with that being allocated based upon identity.
I think the libertarian way of thinking of liberty applies very effectively here: you should have the liberty to do whatever u want on the condition it does not reduce the net total liberty of society. Giving poor people food, water, housing, education, etc (essentially general necessities to produce productive members of society) does not reduce total net liberty it increases it. Taking an opportunity away from me and giving it to someone else based on the colour of their skin does not increase liberty. The number of opportunities remain the same, it causes less qualified people to have positions despite more qualified alternatives being willing and available. It also has a byproduct of enforcing racist/sexist/homophobic grouping and thinking.
The percentage of the global population made up by white people has declined from 40% to 7% in like 50years.
Well yeah if you just gonna make quotes up I guess anything is true.