Track_ShovelNew single: Skin head soldier?
MacWhite liberation
From fucking what?
π¦πΊππ¦ππ₯ππππ£π ππ ππππThe percentage of the global population made up by white people has declined from 40% to 7% in like 50years. According to the definition of genocide by the UN that qualifies.
DEI policy has provided opportunity, employment, benefits etc to all minorities across the western world. That by definition requires the reallocation of those thing. Now who loses out in this situation (cos someone is losing out) turns out to be predominantly straight white men.
You can argue all u want that that they shouldnβt have had it in the first place but do you expect them to lie down and take it like good little bitches as u take their opportunity and future away from them?
I think people forget that it only takes a few young men (3.5% of the population) to for them to become the monopoly on violence and take power by force through suppression of everyone else. People do not turn the fascism cos they hate liberty they turn to fascism cos action by peaceful means has failed them.
βThose who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.β - John F. Kennedy
Why are you talking in 3rd person like youβre not one of these milquetoast white never gonna do jack shit pussy fascists when we know you are?
How is wanting absolute equality (not equity) fascist? All I want is everyone to be treated equally and at the moment its me whoβs getting the short end of the stick.
If youβre getting the short end of the stick, you should be mad at the billionaires who are stealing from you.
But Iβm sure you voted for Republicans because they successfully pointed your anger at black and Hispanic people instead.
Iβm getting fucked by dei and immigration both at the hands of billionaires. But your gonna excuse those actions by billionaires because its pushing a narrative you cannot deviate from without being excommunicated from ur little hive mind.
Explain to us how youβve been fucked by DEI and immigration, weβre all ears.
Sure thing.
Dei: Their is a set quantity (with minor variations) of jobs, opportunities, wealth, etc. Those resources should be offered to the person most qualified ie egalitarianism. Dei by definition fails at doing this it reallocates resources from those who are most qualified to other people based on their identity (race, religion, sexuality etc) dei requires and thus enforces racism, sexism, homophobia etc, etc.
Immigration: Economics 101 outlines the laws of supply demand. Immigration increases the supply of labour and increases the demand on goods and services. Thus the value of labour drops and the value of goods and services increases. The end result of this is lower wages and higher cost of living. This is exactly what u want if you are part of the bourgeois ownership class and the opposite to what everyone else wants.
We have statistics to prove that immigrants commit higher levels of crime and cost more in terms of welfare.
Thatβs not to say I dislike all immigration as we can very easily tell from the statistics that certain classes of immigrants actually commit less crime and contribute more to economic prosperity.
If you study economics deeper than 101 you learn that supply-and-demand is mostly a fantasy in the modern age and the problem is oligarchal control and lack of regulations.
But both of your issues boil down to the same point: there are more people than there are useful jobs. The solution is not more jobs or fewer people, itβs decoupling productivity from food and housing. Anything else is admitting that a permanent underclass of jobless, homeless people must exist as an implicit threat against the working class if they get too uppity.
Also, immigrants commit less crime on average and get less in government benefits than citizens. Your βstatisticsβ (that you did not even cite) are made up right-wing xenophobic propaganda.
If you study economics deeper than 101 you learn that supply-and-demand is mostly a fantasy in the modern age and the problem is oligarchal control and lack of regulations.
Your starting to sound like Marx here. You are right for a small subset of monopolised markets mainly due to regulations that are used to lock out competitors.
But both of your issues boil down to the same point: there are more people than there are useful jobs.
Yep
The solution is not more jobs or fewer people, itβs decoupling productivity from food and housing.
Yeah so letβs just reorganise society into a socialist paradise. We live under a capitalist system, under said system my argument holds. It is not your right to receive anything that requires the labour of another human being. It is not your right to require someone to go to work and make ur food for u or build ur house. Plus the classic argument against communist policy applies here why would I wanna be the guy farming or building houses when I could do nothing an get someone else to do it for me? Your system requires an underclass of slave labour be that robotic, human, or underpaid illegal immigrant.
Anything else is admitting that a permanent underclass of jobless, homeless people must exist as an implicit threat against the working class if they get too uppity.
Yeah people need a reason to contribute to society. I contribute cos its making me ungodly rich, granting me extreme liberty, and allowing me to build a better world for when I have children. But some people are lazy, useless, low intelligence imbeciles who need the threat of a low quality of life to give them to kick to get off their ass and do something for society. Which of course raises the question what is that minimum standard. I would say the minimum standard is u get a 3m*3m box with a bed, shitter and shower, u get 3 meals of engineered tasteless grey goo with plain water. Thats the bottom rung of Maslowβs hierarchy of needs taken care of anything more is on u.
Also, immigrants commit less crime on average and get less in government benefits than citizens. Your βstatisticsβ (that you did not even cite) are made up right-wing xenophobic propaganda.
Wrong. Official DHS/ICE data shows 81,312 removable noncitizens arrested in FY2024 with prior convictionsβtotaling 57k assaults, 18k sex offenses, 12k homicides/manslaughtersβhighlighting a massive crime burden from illegal immigrants.On benefits: CIS analysis of 2024 Census SIPP dataβimmigrant-headed households use welfare at 53% (61% for illegal-headed) vs. 37% for native-born, draining billions in Medicaid/SNAP/EITC often via U.S.-born kids.These are from federal reports and Census surveys, not βpropaganda.β Cite yours?
All that to say you havenβt been fucked by DEI or immigration correct? But thanks for the wildly ignorant hypotheticals π
An explanation of owns argument is required a claim that ur original point was correct is not evidence in support of your opinion.
And whatβs my opinion again?