We CAN end poverty and increase quality of life for the vast majority of people on the planet, without increasing either resource or energy consumption. Let's take a quick look at a paper by Jason Hickel and Dylan Sullivan that proves it. ๐งต 1/11
The paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292924000493#b0340
#capitalism #thebubble #poverty #socialism #anticapitalism #digitalsovereignty #techalternatives #bigtech #fediverse
3/11 "This ignores important questions about which sectors need to grow, and whether this could be achieved by reallocating productive capacities from other sectors. Labour and materials that are currently used to produce mansions and casinos can instead be shifted to producing affordable housing; farmland used to produce beef for consumers in the global North can instead be used to produce nutritious foods for workers in the global South, and so on."
4/11 "Recent empirical studies have established the minimum set of specific goods and services that are necessary for people to achieve decent-living standards (DLS), including nutritious food, modern housing, healthcare, education, electricity, clean-cooking stoves, sanitation systems, clothing, washing machines, refrigeration, heating/cooling, computers, mobile phones, internet, transit, etc. This basket of goods and services has been developed through an extensive literature..."
6/11 The paper goes on to calculate the energy and material needs for everyone to have access to these basic living standards. The results?
"These figures are based on a projected population of 8.5 billion in 2050 (consistent with SSP1), whereby extending DLS to all would require 125โ183 EJ per year. This amounts to 30โ44% of current annual global energy use (which was 418 EJ in 20198). Note that these are total annual requirements. To cover DLS gaps requires much less."
7/11 "For a population of 8.5 billion, provisioning DLS would therefore require 28โ40 gigatons of material per year, representing 29โ42% of current global annual material use (which was 95 gigatons in 201911)."
So we would only need 30-44% of global energy use, and 29-42% of global material use!
The paper goes on to highlight one of the key reasons that prevents us from doing this: