I mean, it’s not really bestiality if it isn’t sexual. A gynocological exam also isn’t fingering …

A gynaecologist “treats” the patient, benefitting the patient.

Forcibly impregnating someone is also called rape.

“someone”

Keyword.

If it applies to one animal it should apply to all, but go ahead and be a special snowflake instead

no. different things are different.

The attitude of someone who mistreats animals ☝️

I don’t mistreat animals. this is libelous.

paying someone to kill an animal so that you can consume its corpse is how you treat animals nicely, is it?

I’ve never done that. most people haven’t.

You do it literally every time you purchase a meat product. Meat is made from the dead body of animals. When you buy it, you are retroactively paying for the slaughter of that animal.

money is still bound by linear time. the animal is already dead, and the person who did it is already paid.

You buy dead animal, they kill animal to put on shelf because you bought dead animal.

I’m not responsible for others actions

You know that others will resupply if you buy this thing. If you didn’t knew until now that people resupply what you buy, now you know. Making you definitely are responsible from now on.

Imagine I throw candy at the floor an this kid always picks it up. Then I throw candy at the train tracks and the kid gets ran over. Am I not responsible for the kids actions?

knowledge, being a justified, true belief, precludes knowing the future. I cannot know what others will do.

I used “know” in the colloquial sense. Do you think it’s unjustified to believe that they will resupply your demand?

since the future hasn’t happened yet, no claim about it can, in the present moment, be true. so you can’t know it.

I did not use the word “know” in the question “Do you think it’s unjustified to believe that they will resupply your demand?”. Notably, I asked if it is unjustified to believe so.

You know that others will resupply if you buy this thing

if you will admit that it is impossible to know this, we can follow whatever tangent you like

You claimed it’s impossible to know this in the philosophical sense, granted.

I clarified that my question was posed using “know” in the colloquial sense (i.e. to understand, to take cognition of). The question I originally asked is still unanswered.

Do you think it’s unjustified to believe that they will resupply your demand?

people believe all kinds of things with varying levels of justification. i can probably come up with some justification, but that doesn’t mean i know it.

So you think it’s unjustified?

Or do you think it’s justified? And therefore you believe that they will kill another animal to resupply the demand that you’ve contributed to.