I'm still constantly baffled by just how absolutely beyond shit modern computers are
@OpenComputeDesign x86 was a mistake? :)
@OpenComputeDesign
16 bit was a mistake?
transistors were a mistake?
how modern are we talking? :)

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign

16-bit/early-32-bit was my favorite era. (Basically, the #68k era ;)

Computers were just becoming capable, but not too big for their britches.

@rl_dane @kabel42

Yeah, tbh, we really should have stopped at 32-bit

@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane I had a good time with my first amd athlon 64 but sure, simpler times :)

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign

I think computers were honestly better when they were limited to absolutely no more than 1GB RAM, no more than 256 colors, and no more than 1024x768 screen resolution.

1GB RAM: no LLMs
256 colors: no horrid low-contrast soupy interfaces
XGA Resolution: no horrid empty spaces and bloated interfaces

I keep wanting to make that as an OS 😄

(If only I had the skillz)

@rl_dane @kabel42

Yeah, older GUIs were _so much better_ it's actually impressive just how fast and how hard GUI design has fallen off a cliff

@OpenComputeDesign @kabel42

Yeah, and the pushback I get from statements like that is insane to me.

"But we don't want to go back to Windows 95."

I don't either, it was a crap OS, but the interface was better than the crap interfaces they're shipping today, so ?!?!????!?

@rl_dane

I'd rather w95 with its software suite and interface than w11 with its.

W11 is a worse OS than w95 was.

@OpenComputeDesign @kabel42

@pixx @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42

It does have memory protection, though. That was Windows 95's most glaring weakness.

Edit: I meant to say that it doesn't. derp.
Edit2: No, I was saying that W11 has memory protection. lol

@rl_dane @pixx @kabel42

Modern software still absolutely _sucks_ with anything to do with memory. Any claims modern OS's make are, at best, just giving people a false sense of security.

@OpenComputeDesign @pixx @kabel42

Brofam, Windows 95 used to crash on me daily.

Linux? Basically never.

FreeBSD? Maaaaybe once a week.

@rl_dane @OpenComputeDesign @pixx i had to reinstall win95 about as ofthen as i reboot linux :)

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign @pixx

Oh yeah, I had my CD Key MEMORIZED. XD

(Of course, the keys were a lot simpler and shorter back then ;)

@rl_dane @kabel42 @pixx

Last few times I installed and activated (much more recent) versions of windows, had a problem where they'll accept the key, activate, then after a few days, deactivate and make you enter the key and activate again. Windows _is_ terrible. It's just, _all_ modern software is terrible as well.

@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane @pixx That reminds me, I have to make IT do that to my VM :)

@OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 @pixx

Yes, but some are terribler than others. XD

@rl_dane @kabel42 @pixx It's true, 10/11 are well beyond 95 levels of terrible. It's just that linux is also working it's hardest to surpass 95 levels of bad, too

@OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 @pixx

No, I wouldn't compare the jankiest modern linux distro to Windows 95.

95 was terrible.

@pixx @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42

98 was the meagerest refinement.

Win2k or go home.

@rl_dane @pixx @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 I will gladly insert myself into this thread just to say that XP was the first good Windows. Everything before was a crash-fest.
@jp
Fair enough. Xp, Vista, 7 was peak windows era
@rl_dane @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42
@rl_dane @pixx @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 I was super young back then so my memories of 98 and 2000 blend together. It might have been more stable than 98? The XP to 7 era design is just so iconic though.

@jp @rl_dane @pixx @kabel42

Win 2K was seriously overshadowed by XP. Not that XP doesn't deserve it's cred, it absolutely does. It's just a shame though, because 2k was easily top three with XP and 7.

2K was just in kind of an awkward place, where it was kinda sorta still meant to be proffesional only, (It was an NT, after all), 98SE and ME were the fresh home OS's, and XP came out soon after, and was properly released for home use.

Also confusing 2000 vs millennium naming prolly didn't help

@jp @rl_dane @pixx @kabel42

ME did _properly_ suck, btw. The horrible reputation is well deserved

@OpenComputeDesign @jp @pixx @kabel42

Egad, there were SO MANY people calling in to tech lines saying "I have Windows 2000" when they actually just had Windows Me, which was total crap.

XP was the very first NT-based OS for consumers.

@jp @pixx @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42

There were basically three separate Windowses:

1980s | 1990s | 2000s | 2010s |20s Windows 1.x -> 2.x -> 3.x -> 95 -> 98 -> ME NT 3.x -> NT 4 -> 2000 -> XP -> Vista -> 7 -> 8 -> 10 -> 11 [-------Windows CE--/-Mobile>Zune->Phone-]

W2k had the stability of XP without the Fischer-Price hilariously-bad copy of Mac OS X's interface.

I'm sure that XP had some features that 2k lacked, probably in the DirectX department, but 2k was plenty useable.

Actual dates:
1985-11-20 Windows 1.0
1987-12-09 Windows 2.0
1990-05-22 Windows 3.0
1995-07-14 Windows 95
1998-05-15 Windows 98
2000-06-19 Windows Millennium Edition

1993-07-27 Windows NT 3.1
1996-07-31 Windows NT 4.0
1999-12-15 Windows 2000
2001-08-24 Windows XP
2006-11-08 Windows Vista
2009-07-22 Windows 7
2012-08-01 Windows 8
2015-07-15 Windows 10
2021-07-24 Windows 11

1996-11-16 Windows CE
2000-04-19 Windows Mobile
2006-11-14 Zune variant of Windows CE
2010-10-21 Windows Phone 7

@rl_dane @jp @pixx @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 IIRC the big architectural change from XP to Win2k was moving access to the GDI out of ring 0. Network stack "improvements"?

It was such a quaint time. I may have hurt myself puling forward those memories. Ha.

@RootMoose @rl_dane @jp @pixx @OpenComputeDesign I only remember signed drivers, but i think those were only mandatory on 64bit

@kabel42 @rl_dane @jp @pixx @OpenComputeDesign come to think of it - GDI change may have been NT->XP.

Why am I thinking about this!? <old man shakes fist at WinXP background grass> lol

@rl_dane @jp @pixx @OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 Win2k was the first Windows I could really trust. PS: at the 3.1 epoch I was a student.

XP was not bad either, but I still prefer W2k. After that, things only got worse. I completely abandoned Windows in the beginning of Win10. Now I have to use Win11 on work computer, but it's still bad. Even on Microsoft cloud, with Microsoft infra, using only Microsoft software with mostly default options, it is still buggy. Arch gives me a more stable productivity feeling than Windows.

@rl_dane @kabel42 @pixx

Well, even if it's not that bad yet, it's sure heading there _FAST_

@kabel42 @rl_dane @pixx

Have to reinstall linux at least once a season :P

@OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 @pixx

I have linux installs last me years. Except for Arch-based. :P
Also had bad luck with Solus, but I only tried it once.

@rl_dane @OpenComputeDesign @pixx
'I've installed arch when my core 2 duo was new and it still works on a AMD Ryzen 9 7900, so i can't complain

@kabel42 @rl_dane @pixx

Nahhh, arch based distros die after using pacman more than once. First time is free. Second time always comes with dire consequences. Up to and including kernel panics

@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane @pixx thats why you use yay ;)

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign @pixx

Okay, but that's worse.
I mean, you you do get how that's worse, right?

#RandomAproposTheGoodPlaceQuotes #S1E01 #TheGoodPlace #TheGoodPlaceQuotes

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign @pixx

yay can really mess up a system. Not that it ever happened to me, but there's a lot of caution about it, and that's why it's not installed by default (IIRC).

@rl_dane @OpenComputeDesign @pixx it is if you use the endeouver installer :)
It also just uses libpackman, so it shouldn't make much of a difference except for extra info in the update dialog and some aur automation

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign @pixx

Endeavour pooped in the bed when doing a grub update.

So did Manjaro.

I swore off Arch-based after that.

@rl_dane @OpenComputeDesign @pixx I had to boot from a usb stick and grub-install once
@rl_dane @OpenComputeDesign @pixx on that machine, yes

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign @pixx

I could neither resuscitate it, nor find any useful info or help on the forums for doing so, neither on Manjaro nor EndeavourOS. :/

@rl_dane @OpenComputeDesign @pixx for me sudo grub-install was all i needed IIRC, maybe you had a broken initramfs?

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign @pixx

No idea. It was my work computer, and I didn't have a ton of time to futz with it. I backed it up, nuked, and paved. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@rl_dane @kabel42 @pixx

LUKS??? Gee, talk about things that will _RUIN EVERYTHING_

Nothing could ever make me touch LUKS ever again. Nuh uh, not a chance, ain't no way

@OpenComputeDesign @kabel42 @pixx

making my system unbootable is less bad than giving my data to housekeeping, the TSA, or pervy patrick at the coffee shop.

@kabel42 @OpenComputeDesign @pixx

* Glances over at the corner of the room where #GRUB and #LUKS are cowering, whimpering, and shaking as soon as Arch is mentioned

I can complain. 🤣

@rl_dane @kabel42 @pixx

Well, the problem is, even if you have an install that lasts a few years, you'll still have to reinstall once the mirrors for your version shut down.

@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane @pixx My ISP has a mirror that been solid for 2 decades

@kabel42 @rl_dane @pixx

They're still providing the same version after twenty years? OpenBSD for instance only seems to keep like two minor versions max, maybe three on their "tardiest" mirrors

@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane @pixx no, i think arch usually only has one version on the mirrors
@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane @pixx But they have pretty old debian packages

@kabel42 @rl_dane @pixx

Exactly. Worthless. Means you need to reinstall every time you wanna install a new program

@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane @pixx why? what would that get you?

@kabel42 @rl_dane @pixx

What would what get me? Reinstalling?

You typically can't skip updates, so if the repos for your installed version get taken down, then you can't install any new software, and you can't update to a supported version, so you have to just reinstall a fresh with a supported version to install new software. Pretty much every time I boot up an OpenBSD computer after a few years, I have to reinstall. It's their biggest failing

@OpenComputeDesign @rl_dane @pixx at least with arch there shouldn't be a difference between updating and reinstalling 🤷

@kabel42 @rl_dane @pixx

I... Don't even understand what you're saying? They're completely different things?