ššššš
ššššš
I know everyone says it, but labels are pretty useless.
Even terms like āmasculineā and āfeminineā hold so much dumb baggage theyāre both functionally useless.
I know guys who want to be subservient to pretty girls, and girls who want stocky girls to dominate them.
Sexuality doesnāt fit neatly into boxes, even in the best of circumstances - so much of it is contextual, and is pointless to attempt to pin down.
Labels are just succinct words/phrases that try to give people some approximate idea of where we fall on a handful of vast spectrums. Theyāre not meant to be 100% accurate.
Iām probably pansexual, but I tell people Iām bi because thatās a word most people are familiar with. And even then Iām like 80-90% into women. So I donāt really fit neatly into the bisexual box, but that label conveys enough relevant information.
Yeah this is what Iāve always thought.
I believe Iām straight but if a guy presented feminine enough Iād be attracted to them. Only problem is I donāt like penises but if you can hide it Iām all in
Thatās a problem with everything though. No matter what definition for something you come up with, even if most of population agrees with it, youād have aggresively vocal minority that will try and push it other way to conform it to their perception/goals etc.
Straight means that as a man you are sexually attracted only to women. Already met people who dragged it into the āfeminine peopleā camp instead and people who dragged it into āfeminine womenā camp. I tend on the other hand to stick into the tried and tested too much so I find both irritating xD
I see it as different things, you can fall for one gender, you can feel sexual attractive for another but most of the time do they sync. So that made also sense why some had crushes on the gender they wouldnāt be together with.
It all clicked when I got to know a girl who could fall in love with men and women but couldnāt enjoy having sex with guys even tho she tried to really liked it with the guys she fell for. And that also made me understand what pan really was because I thought it was just bi with extra steps but when gender identity, gender romance and gender sexually was all different things then it all made sense.
Personally, there is not one person in the gender Iām not attracted to that even vaguely seems interesting that way.
Might as well be thinking of grasshoppers or something.
That would imply at least 30% is bi/pan.
And even at 80%, early humans already had it really rough. There seems to have been 2 near extinctions of modern humans in the far past, so when the population is about 1000, having 200 not contribute is pretty big. Especially with the higher mortality rates early humans had in regards to birth.
Itās more likely the percentage started extremely low and increased over time as population stability increased, since then it would reach a point where 10-20% not having kids wouldnāt be as big a deal since there would now be hundreds of thousands or even over a million.
Honestly itās weird how adamant people are there have always been people who solely preferred one sex over the other. While itās generally true for modern society, people wouldnāt have even understood what you mean in ancient times by āsexual orientationā, really. I mean you could obviously explain it and people could answer to a degree, butā¦
Well, think of this, we have left and right in our languages. We all know those are relative terms. My left and your left are different, most of the time. Anyway, there exists a tribe who donāt have relative words for directions, and they only use cardinal directions, all the time. As in if theyāre hanging a painting, theyād say āno, no, a bit to the northā instead of āleftā. On a tangent, it makes them very much immune to getting lost as they have incredible sense of direction for that reason. My point being that to us itās simple that you just use left and right, why wouldnāt you, when people know what it means and itās simple. So why doesnāt that tribe use them? Idk, itās just not in their culture. Just like such strict classifications of sexual orientation werenāt much of a thing in ancient and prehistoric times.
Bill And The Romans Talk About Sexuality | The Eaters Of Light | Doctor Who
Cornelius: Yeah, donāt worry, Bill, Lucius will look after you.
Lucius: Shut up, Cornelius!
Bill: Ahh, Lucius, erm, right, listen thereās, erm, something I should explain.
Lucius: What?
Bill: This is probably just a really difficult idea. I donāt like men that way.
Lucius: What? Not ever?
Bill: Nah, not ever. Only women.
Nahā¦not ever.
Lucius: Oh. Alright, yeah, Iāve got it. Youāre like Vitus then.
Bill: What?
Lucius: He only likes men.
Vitus: Some men. Better looking men than you, Lucius.
Lucius: I donāt think itās narrow-minded, I think itās fine. You know what you like.
Bill: And you like both?
Lucius: Iām just ordinary, I like men and women.

Similar.
Charlie Sheen said that he didnāt pay women for sex. He paid them to have sex and then leave.
That actually kinda makes sense though. He was saying he didnāt want a relationship, just the sex part. Iām sure Charlie Sheen would have no problem finding people to have sex with that didnāt require payment, they would just expect a relationship as part of it.
As opposed to other dude, who just was gay and was trying to sound like he wasnāt gay.
One of the few funny āCathyā cartoons ever.
Cathy and Irving are talking and Irving asks Cathy what she wants in a man. He has to be a self-made millionaire; who is not materialistic. He has to love pets; he canāt own any. He canāt be afraid of commitment; he canāt have any exes.
Irving goes off. He points out that what she wants is impossible.
Cathy asks Irving what he wants.
āA beautiful virgin who loves sex.ā
