icymi, local net person Cory Doctorow has decided to give up his unofficial role as the fediverse's Emotional Support Celebrity in bombastic style by coming to the defence of "open source" LLM's https://pluralistic.net/2026/02/19/now-we-are-six/ (not tagging him to avoid a pile on)

Tante has a good write up about the strangeness of his argument here
https://tante.cc/2026/02/20/acting-ethical-in-an-imperfect-world/ (again, don't want to pile on).

I also wanted to add that Cory deploy's all this rhetorical barrage in service of... having a robot proofreader. His use case is not restoring justice and dignity to the underpaid, traumatised transnational workers who built the models he uses (
https://www.noemamag.com/the-exploited-labor-behind-artificial-intelligence/), it is not helping the people of Southern Memphis escape smog and pollution, it is not protecting the mostly female victims of NCII generation (indeed, millions of private unmanaged generative machines might make that problem even harder to fight against). It is not a meaningful argument about leaving space for "good" or ethical generation - it is sophistry in service of avoiding the inconvenience of actually assessing if he's acting ethically. Tante is right to expect more from him.
Pluralistic: Six Years of Pluralistic (19 Feb 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

all I'm saying is if he'd sat down and gone "who am I helping with this?" the answer makes it clear that this isn't a useful thing to do with LLM's

because the answer is "Cory Doctorow" and no one else
@kalviter @Sharksonaplane we have long since been baffled as to why people treat that guy as anything other than a capitalist hack writer trying to sell you his books and speeches, but maybe this will break people's illusions finally
@atax1a @Sharksonaplane it is probably very silly for me, a hack sci-fi writer who does it for no money, to get too high and mighty about another person's writing

but I will say that this excerpt of Unauthorized Bread, the thing I've seen quite a few people on here talk about as "brilliant", is quite... boring? indulgent? Idk, it's not my thing

idk I feel the same way about all this as I do whenever Taylor Swift's private jet use get's brought up. Why are so many emotions pegged to the sainthood of some random person? Hopefully you're right and people manage to maintain a bit more skepticism in the future

edit: forgot to attach the excerpt
​​ https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future-tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/
Unauthorized Bread: Real rebellions involve jailbreaking IoT toasters

Cory Doctorow's book, Radicalized, is up for a CBC award. To celebrate, here's an excerpt.

Ars Technica
@kalviter @Sharksonaplane everything he writes is smug, superficial, and self-congratulatorily wanky. so of course the leftoid part of the tech industry, made up of people who haven't done any critical self-examination of the libertarian beliefs of the field, love it and take any criticism thereof extremely personally.

@kalviter This is just an EXCERPT??? oh my god it's so fucking long and annoying

And like, all it does is validate everything we've been saying about him

THIS is the writing that person I blocked said was "anti-capitalist"?? lmaoooooo

@Sharksonaplane "twelve year old child asks asinine questions" is certainly one of the narrative devices of all time

the revolution is simply the freedom to do compute, you understand. The more computering, the freer the people /s

@atax1a
Maybe because of the body of his generally anti-captslist work?

@kalviter @Sharksonaplane

@dzwiedziu he is a slop purveyor and a kept pet of the tech industry. you are a rube if you believe him to be anticapitalist
@atax1a
Using ad hominems instead of proofs doesn't help your case, but the opposite.
@dzwiedziu not really a huge fan of debatebro tactics from randos, take a hike
@atax1a @dzwiedziu I've never once seen him promote alternatives to capitalism. He exposes very specific problems with capitalism, but he has never to the best of my knowledge challenged the edifice directly or even entertained the thought.
@reflex @atax1a @dzwiedziu He's written a whole book on the subject - Walkaway. You can critique the book in a variety of ways, but it most certainly promotes an alternative to capitalism.

@illegaldaydream @atax1a @dzwiedziu I have not read it so I'm not going to say you are wrong, but the summary on wikipedia seems to imply it's a fiction story set in a near future world where people can quit working because tech made it all possible.

That world does not exist, is not likely to exist, is not a solution to society and is what people like Elon and Sam promote constantly to distract from harm.

Maybe it's better than the summary, I don't know.

@reflex Yes, most of Doctorow's work explores social issues through fiction, including his post-scarcity anarchist utopia. As I said, we can critique that vision, but to suggest that Doctorow has never entertained the thought of alternatives to capitalism is demonstrably false.
@illegaldaydream I do not consider that to be a serious work of anticapitalism, but I don't challenge your right to do so since you've read it.