@quinn Absolutely, and if anyone thinks this is new you can find the same kind of reporting from 2023:
They don't only make money from hosting Nazis. They directly pay some of those for their content.
Yes.
But somehow I find directly paying fash writers yet worse than taking a cut from subscriptions. That's why I added this.
@dheadshot it is, and I've been talking about it for years. But, you know, it bears repeating. And people are getting more sensitive about Nazi and Nazi adjacent shit these days. But it always bears repeating.
As does mentioning Outpost and Ghost, because it better to come with alternatives than merely condemn the shit.
@quinn Yes.
I am intersections in what their boundaries are, they are briefly mentioned at the bottom of the article: explicit calls to violence
I assume legality would be a boundary, so no CSAM? I am guessing
I do not want to start imagining what sort of horrible things would meet their "standards", I started to, yuk.
I am sympathetic to "free speech " and "safe Harbour " arguments, but IMO they apply to ISPs (and mail carriers) not platforms
@quinn revealed? this goes back farrrrr https://doyles.substack.com/p/in-queers-we-trust-all-others-pay
people will still use substack for the convenience and reach, just like they did (and sometimes do) with twitter :/