Wrote a new post exploring three ideas I keep coming back to: local-first software, user-controlled personalization, and decentralization as a way to avoid single points of failure.

The short version:
→ Your data should live on your device first, not on someone else's server
→ Personalization should mean you owning your identity, not an algorithm profiling you
→ Decentralization isn't about hype — it's the same principle behind email and P2P networks

I tried to keep it grounded and skip the buzzwords. If you're building in this space or just thinking about where software is heading, I'd appreciate your thoughts.

https://medium.com/lifefunk/your-data-your-rules-local-first-personalization-and-decentralization-without-the-buzzwords-9cf84351beed

#LocalFirst #Decentralization #SelfSovereignIdentity #DID #Fediverse #OpenSource #Privacy

Your Data, Your Rules: Local First, Personalization, and Decentralization Without the Buzzwords

There’s a quiet shift happening in how software is being built. It’s about where your data lives, who gets to control it, and what happens…

Medium

@rstlix

You may want to read this too, if you haven't yet? .

https://fosstodon.org/@DLC/116029069755963574

#Uncentralizability

Dimly Lit Corners (@[email protected])

"It is common to hear the word “#decentralized” thrown around in modern tech circles. But often, this is merely a marketing term for “slightly #DistributedCentralization”. A blockchain with a few dominant miners, or a federated protocol with a few giant servers. In practice, it’s still centralized. It simply has a few centers instead of one. Reticulum goes further. It wants #Uncentralizability." https://reticulum.network/manual/zen.html#decentralization-or-uncentralizability #Reticulum #DemandUncentralizability

Fosstodon
@DLC hey, thank you, I've just heard of it, I'll try to explore and learn it

@rstlix I would love to talk more about this someday (when we both have the time)

https://mstdn.social/@DLC/115683514442679527