Ironically a few weeks after reading this excellent piece from Dariusz Jemielniak, I've 'retired' from #Wikipedia, which I've been editing for more than half of my life:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00075-0

Academics absolutely should take Wikipedia seriously as the single most effective means of public dissemination available to us.

But...

The academic community failed Wikipedia for 25 years — now it might fail us

Artificial-intelligence systems are feeding on Wikipedia without giving back, and academic indifference is threatening the survival of what is arguably the most widely used reference work on the planet.

At the same time, there are major systemic barriers to academics—or really anyone beyond a very narrow demographic and personality type—contributing to (the English) Wikipedia. And there are major systemic barriers preventing even 'insiders' like me and Dariusz from fixing that.

Now I've given up on direct editing myself, I'm going to keep pondering how #academia can support and contribute to Wikipedia indirectly.

@joeroe if I may ask, why did you give up direct editing? Curious as an occasional editor myself.
@openpast A combination of the (English) Wikipedia community changing such that it took more and more time/effort to make meaningful changes, and my life changing such that I had less time to give. At a certain point I found my motivation just disappeared.