New essay:
Phantom Fluency
Why listening to smart people doesn't make you more thoughtful. You're not bad at remembering podcasts. Podcasts are bad at being remembered.
New essay:
Phantom Fluency
Why listening to smart people doesn't make you more thoughtful. You're not bad at remembering podcasts. Podcasts are bad at being remembered.
@tg small quibbles, but I think it depends on the podcasts you listen to. It’s not unusual for tech/nerd podcasts to have show notes which are also searchable on a website. And the more topical shows I listen to have chapter markers dividing each episode into topics.
But more often I’m just listening to hear my “friends” shoot the shit for an hour. I listen just because I’ve listened to the same guys for 5–10 years.
@tg there was recently talk about AI generated podcasts and that feels a bit alien? They are not people I care about and they don’t have a deep history in talking about the subject.
But I guess it makes more sense if your motivation to listen is to learn new things and make use of your time (successful or not.)
@tg
I'm in a similar boat to @oivaeskola . I think podcasts can be really good in terms of information and research and learning, in the same way that interviews, lectures and speeches can, they just ask for a different type of engagement than text. I can't go and reference every sentence of my lectures at uni, but if the lecturer was good I understood a concept better, and knew where to go to read more and *how* to read that resource. With recordings and chapters, I can go back, listen again with new ears. The learning is part of a process of learning, and in that sense I think the words can be very alive. The podcast Bloodwork puts it well, at the end of each episode: “Bloodwork is a discussion, consider this your invitation”.
Of course, not all podcasts work this way, but the ones I find myself wanting to listen to (that aren't entertainment focused) do.
And with regards to referencing, so long as I can find the episode (and preferably thewsegment), I don't have anything wrong with podcasts being difficult to find references for. If I'm looking for a specific piece of information, that should be in text as a reference material, and likely already is somewhere. Otherwise, if I'm looking for a quote or an observation, I think there's a value in re-listening.
@gunchleoc @cuddlyanarchist @tg yeah. I just take issue saying this is a limitation of podcasts (“MP3 does not know what the episode is about, who is speaking, when topics change”)
I see it more a producer problem. There’s nothing stopping you from adding a transcript to show notes, or dividing an episode into a hundred chapters, and then surfacing that information also on web. Some podcast services already publish the show notes.
@tg just finished you essay, it's really great, thanks for sparking thoughts.
Can you elaborate on 30 years? From what point in time you're counting?
Books have had indexes for five hundred years. The web has had links for thirty.
@tg “Podcast listening inverts the spacing effect perfectly. You hear an idea once, in full, with no review, no testing, no return. The conditions for forgetting are ideal.”
Yes. And they are too long. Instead of a 30 minute podcast discussing and dissecting one topic, they skip through topics like a newsreel.
In the end you don’t remember anything specific. And you only just skimmed the surface of the topic.
@tg I like your idea about a podcast player that it shouldn’t look and work like a music player.
Maybe one day you can explore a podcast app in the vein of Current?