Funny how folks in the West will debate the ethics of going back in time to kill baby Hitler whenever the topic of time travel comes up but no one ever considers going back to stop colonialism.

đŸ¤”

@aral wouldn't that be like trying to stop the wind with your hands? Did colonialism not stem from what were other practices in existence since the dawn of mankind? How was colonialism different from the land conquest enacted by Huns and Mongols? Did the concept of empire not exist way before what we call colonialism? Think Romans, Aztecs, Mayans, Turks, and so on. Who would you exactly kill or lock in a box and throw the key away to prevent colonialism? Maybe the first human?
@Disputatore @aral There are some really obvious, named people to take out to avoid the worst horrors of genocide/colonialism, some named ships to sink, some named battles to sway or stop.
We know a lot of history from a lot of the world and there's no problem pinpointing a lot of worst contacts.
So trying the "we're the virus" rhetoric on a damn hypothetical thought experiment just showed you're enthusiastically comfortable with the status quo.
@Mabande @aral it shows I'm an enthusiastic fan of logic. And your comment shows you're not. Your comment also shows you're very fast jumping to conclusions. You also seem to not take conclusions out of your own thinking process. Your solution would mean conducting mass killing to prevent mass killing. Which deserves a standing ovation.
@Disputatore @aral Let's take a look at my "mass killings" with some examples:
Talking Hitler and the top Nazis out of the equation to prevent the extermination camps; sinking ships of slavers to prevent the Atlantic slave trade; deposing a king and his generals to prevent a battle that would lead to a genocidal conquest.
Thing is, I didn't even say they need to be killed, that's on you, but stopping people hellbent on murdering innocent people is apparently a bad thing. Even hypothetically.