#Norway #Photography #Lumix #EwenInNorway
Gonna be seeing a lot of this mountain for the next couple of months. Today the pink skies turned up to welcome the winter solstice. #Norway #Photography #Lumix
@ewen Can't help you with wide-ange fisheye for landscapes and sky... but I've used an 11mm fisheye (16mm equivalent on a full frame) on a freeway shoulder. The reason: to bend what would otherwise be boring straight lines and make the result more interesting.
The fisheye's swoopy effect was most obvious in the foreground and seemed to fade out as distance increased. So it was all about bending close objects.
In your scenario, I imagine the coolness would apply similarly - say from bending nearby trees and buildings.
Add: I enjoyed shooting with the fisheye most when I wasn't taking more obvious, symmetric, snout-on compositions. That's just me, I think.
And yes, as you said, with all wide angles, objects in the distance are rendered even more distant. For an aurora, that's not so bad since it's sky-filling. But a distant mountain or structure... ooof.
@ewen
I should also have mentioned that photographing people with a fisheye can be problematic.
With ultrawides in general, when people are placed near the edge of the frame, you get a taffy effect. With fisheyes, it's not just the edge: the center of the frame is also a problem.
You know how they say a camera adds 10 pounds to a person? A fisheye adds 150. Portraiture requires consent.
Most of it is correctable back to rectilinear in post, I think.
The percentage closerness of the tip of the nose not so much.
Takes an environmental portrait to an extreme though.
@ewen
That has been my experience too, Ewen. The stretching for the correction pushes the edges of the photo off the canvas.
I haven't experimented with enlarging the canvas before the lens correction but I suspect it will not help.
I also wonder whether the stretching involves "inventing" pixels - much like any transformation - and that, at the pixel peeping level, is noticable.
@BobHorowitz @ewen
The image is round, I think.
How much falls off the edges of the sensor is one thing.
Correcting it to rectilinear straightens lines, but doesn't supply missing edges.
I find mine difficult to use.