And don’t get me wrong, #Meta is an evil empire and that wants to drain humanity of anything they can in order to turn a profit. I just want to be able to follow my friends and for them to be able to follow me. I scared too many people away from #Mastodon because I introduced them to it too soon (it was around 2017).
@jrollans people keep bringing it up and asking about it, but then it usually gets confused with the "mailing list" like fedigroups where you can subscribe to posts that include @groupname. Not really groups in my opinion.
There's rumours of a dormant branch of Mastodon that was abandoned and if it exists it's several years old.
@leanderlindahl I agree, those two features do get confused for each other often and the type of groups I think we need are more like the Meta style groups feature. The other version is basically pointless because we can already follow hashtags and build groups around those. Plus, a real group feature needs moderation features and the ability to control the flow of users who can join.
There is a branch of Mastodon that has such a thing, it’s actually been kept updated with the main branch.
What kind of groups do you have in mind?
Something like #Guppe groups? (Currently no longer active, afair).
Or something with more features?
@jrollans @nick I assume Mastodon groups will require more complexity than microblogging, but it could be an optional add-on for "ambitious servers".
The main feature/requirement for masto groups would be that they're discoverable and joinable via a regular mastodon account, because there's where it'd be a game changer.
Otherwise people can just use Matrix, Mattermost, Signal, Olvid, Ginlo... But that removes the discoverability and "joinability".