Tonight Democrats proved that old quip.
If a genie gave Democrats 3 wishes, they'd negotiate it down to 1, and then wish for something they think Republicans will like.
We need a true opposition party now more than ever. Because this aint it.
Tonight Democrats proved that old quip.
If a genie gave Democrats 3 wishes, they'd negotiate it down to 1, and then wish for something they think Republicans will like.
We need a true opposition party now more than ever. Because this aint it.
@QasimRashid Yes, they are cowards just like the literal centrists under the Nazis...
@freediverx @QasimRashid Then they are indeed "#ControlledOpposition" if not outright #collaborators!
@freediverx @kkarhan @QasimRashid
whynotboth.gif
Apparently (just saw this as more details are coming out) the deal will reverse the mass firings of government employees , set up a mid-December vote on extending AFA subsidies, and will fund most federal agencies until late January.
@bzdev @QasimRashid
Wow, can’t tell if I’m more impressed by your fawning defense of corrupt corporate Democrats or your citation of a <checks notes> Bloomberg article to support your argument.
Correction: Forbes
@freediverx @QasimRashid While neither Forbes, Bloomberg, the NYT, or the WSJ are perfect, their news articles tend to be more accurate than many other outfits as far as reporting the facts go. That doesn't mean you should accept their opinion pieces, which can be highly slanted.
There is a famous case of the NYT getting things really, really wrong in an editorial, finally publishing a retraction decades after the mistake:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2018/07/19/the-correction-heard-round-the-world-when-the-new-york-times-apologized-to-robert-goddard/
@bzdev @QasimRashid
I’m not saying those publications regularly publish blatantly false information, as one might expect from Fox News ,for example. But they consistently frame stories in ways that favor capital and power, while relying on sources with the same biases.
Note, for example, how the NYT regularly acts as stenographers for Israel, posting corrections days or weeks later when it’s too late to make a difference.
Not to mention their horrible editorials and opinion pieces.
@bzdev @QasimRashid
The NYT features opinion pieces with a very specific conservative bias, and their reporting consistently frames stories with that same bias.
List of The New York Times controversies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_New_York_Times_controversies
Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist Chris Hedges Exposes How the New York Times Became Israel’s Favorite Mouthpiece
https://www.reddit.com/r/AlJazeera/comments/1llqlek/chris_hedges_exposes_how_the_new_york_times/
Is the New York Times trying to wreck Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral bid?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/07/is-the-new-york-times-trying-to-wreck-zohran-mamdanis-mayoral-bid
@bzdev @QasimRashid
When it comes to journalistic standards, their prime directives appear to be 1) don't fuck with the advertisers, and 2) never risk losing access to those in power.
How ‘access journalism’ is threatening investigative journalism
https://theconversation.com/how-access-journalism-is-threatening-investigative-journalism-108831
@KanaMauna
Voting won't help. Elected officials will always side with the government, power and money, even when it goes against everything they believe in (see Sarah McBride).
Either out of fear, out of greed, or out of a will to maintain power. The only way to fight fascism is to actually fight. Politicians won't do it for you.
@QasimRashid
Um, no. Under our current system, the elected officials are the government. If you don’t like them, work hard to get out the vote to get new reps. Acting as if voting doesn’t work guarantees nothing will change. Fighting by itself is useless since it won’t elect a new government (unless your goal is to kill everyone, which I don’t recommend).
@KanaMauna @QasimRashid yeah the fast takes on this will not age well.
King is not even a Democrat.
@QasimRashid Tbf, it was only 8 out of the Democrat Senates who who sold out and voted against the rest of the party, which had understandably caused an uproar within it. Outside of it too I suppose.
Still, the results don't make things any better.
A stupidity indeed…
@QasimRashid
There can only be two functional parties in a winner-take-all system. And we're stuck with that system until the parties feel like reforming it. Challenging the dems with a new party would merely split the non-fascist vote.
The Democratic Party must be forced to reform via primaries. Get the grifters out, and replace them with candidates dedicated to both party and national reform.
Waouh, c'est exactement le Parti Socialiste (en France)
cowards
1)
Refferring to the "Dirty Deal": https://mastodon.social/@Mons1serrata/115530805824998565
♦️Thread♦️
2)
a) As I said above: a reall democracy needs more than two parties.
b) It needs a different voting system! Too often, a president not actually voted by the people nevertheless won the poll.
Legislation always meets in the middle you complete dumbfvck. That middle is partly determined by how big the right wing is. Holy shit berniebros are stupid
Personality cults make people stupid