@dnkboston @HeavenlyPossum @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder
A system that requires winning every single election in order to avoid fascism (and then still does a bunch of fascism anyway in the name of "unity" and "bipartisanship" and "winning the middle") is a fascist system. These are not "the imperfections of Democratic candidates", these are the built-in conclusions of a governmental system built by wealthy white supremacist patriarchs to maintain their own power against increasing popular calls for actual liberty and equality. And, historically, liberalism (including conservatism, obviously) has always preferred throwing in with fascism rather than actually embracing positive progress, because liberalism is more ideologically compatible with fascism than it is with anticapitalist progressivism, and because the people targeted for extermination by fascism are already the people who liberal capitalism treated like shit anyway (see: French poilce and politicians during the Nazi occupation who turned over their own citizens to the Nazi extermination machine)
Maybe those "meaningful recommendations" are more worth considering than you seem to think. It would genuinely be easier to completely start over than to try to reform the system into something resembling a land of liberty and justice for all. There is vanishingly little left of value in the current system thanks to the people who've run it for the past few decades.