"If we don't recognize that #FOSS isn't just a licensing regime but civic infrastructure, then the next generation of developers will inherit a world where coding is privatized, history is obscured, and the Internet itself becomes another closed platform of code labeled public domain by LLM-powered chatbots that is locked up and proprietary."

https://www.zdnet.com/article/why-open-source-may-not-survive-the-rise-of-generative-ai/

#OpenSource #LLM #AI

Why open source may not survive the rise of generative AI

Generative AI may be eroding the foundation of open source software. Provenance, licensing, and reciprocity are breaking down.

ZDNET
@luis_de_sousa in general I don't like so much this kind of articles as they are alarming and very one sided. They don't respect the daily effort of people like my brother @eloquence who is building reliable and trustworthy common resources using AI. https://permacommons.org/
Permacommons - Minding the Future

Building a permanent home for useful shared resources maintained with AI assistance

Permacommons

@Lioh You miss the point. The article is not against #AI per se, but they way it is being employed by software corporations.

As someone involved in various #OpenSource projects I can guarantee the content of the article rings very true.

@luis_de_sousa ah, I understand. The question then is if copyleft is still necessary if everything will be public domain.

@Lioh That is one of the questions.

However, "public domain" does not really exist in Europe. As far as I can tell, here you cannot claim a piece of work "does not have an author". I guess a good deal of jurisprudence is necessary to figure all this out. And the meantime we have to keep #OpenSource alive somehow.