Carney: “What makes those emissions go down will be carbon capture and storage.”

That is a declaration of war on Canada's environmentalists, who know (as does Carney) that scalable and viable capture/storage technologies are science fiction.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-16/-i-m-the-same-me-canada-s-mark-carney-defends-his-climate-record

#cdnPoli

@timbray we have scalable and viable capture and storage technology; it's called "trees". We need to be preserving the ones we have and planting a lot more. #afforestation #reforestation
@evan If only that were what Carney was talking about.
@timbray I know. 🫤 Western financial players like high-tech solutions you can patent and own and make a killing on; carbon capture, small-scale nuclear power. They don't like commodity solutions like wind and solar, energy efficiency, and the transition to electric vehicles. One of the reasons China is owning the Transition is that they love a commodity product.
@evan @timbray Not Canadian, but I don't think electric vehicles should be on a list about protecting the environment. We all need to transition away from personal vehicles, not manufacturing a billion new 'green' cars.
@amy @timbray I said "electric vehicles" not "electric cars". That includes electric buses, electric trains, and electric ferries. But electric cars are important, and it's far better for people to buy electric cars than gas-powered ones.
@timbray @evan true, but Canada is subsidizing $5,000-10,000 per each personal electric vehicle, and I can think of one or two more cost effective ways to reduce emissions but, unfortunately, those options would also reduce the thousands of lives lost every year, so I guess it's a trade off.
@amy @evan Agreed on the subsidies, but you’ll be happy to hear that many EV buyers (like me for example) don't get them, in our case because it was an expensive EV, it’s reasonably well-regulated.
I do have to say that I think that personal EVs do have a role going forward. There are many for whom public transit isn’t an option and while we need to reduce that number, it will take years and never get to zero.
@timbray @evan It is an option though. It always has been an option.

We could entirely rely on professional taxi drivers, and proffesional ambulance drivers, and professional couriers, and eventually fully automated versions of those, that are all maintained by professional mechanics in a well regulated industry. Nobody needs to own a private car. Buses and taxis have always been a much safer, more efficient option.
@timbray @evan you are right though, there are lots of types of electric vehicles and I assumed you were talking about personal vehicles because the thread was also about commodification, so that's my mistake.

@evan @timbray I generally agree, trees are great, but with caveats:

- simply planting tree monocultures, without establishing complete ecosystems including other lifeforms, reduces resiliency in the face of extreme weather and fails to support biodiversity
- sadly carbon offset schemes can mean tree planting/preservation indirectly increases emissions, if people rely on forests to offset their emissions and then the forests burn down in climate-related fires, releasing the carbon

@skyfaller @evan @timbray my uncle made a documentary about this. Bcisburning.ca