Newsletter: Anatomy of a crypto meltdown
October 2025 brought the most dramatic crypto flash crash of all time, but it was only a dress rehearsal for the systemic crisis the industry is building toward.
https://www.citationneeded.news/anatomy-of-a-crypto-meltdown/
Crypto’s October 10 flash crash, following a Trump social media post threatening severe tariffs on China, caused $19 billion in liquidations. It’s a signal that the market most eager to be taken seriously may also be the one least equipped to handle real-world shocks.
It all started when Trump’s threat to further increase tariffs on China by 100% caused traders to panic sell crypto, with some fleeing for safer assets like Treasury bills and gold.
Bitcoin plummeted 10% in the span of minutes, and other tokens were even harder hit. Altcoins like Solana plunged 40%, and Trump’s own memecoin dipped more than 60%.
Volatility only increased as market makers withdrew. Some accused these institutions abandoning their responsibility during a critical time, while others reasoned that they have no regulatory or other mandate to stabilize markets — potentially at their own expense.
As trading activity spiked, exchanges went down or suffered outages that prevented people from placing trades or shoring up their positions. Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, Robinhood, and several other major platforms were all reported to experience significant service interruptions.
But the biggest factor in the meltdown was leverage. As prices dropped, leveraged positions were forcibly liquidated. This contributed to sell pressure, causing prices to go lower, triggering more liquidations. A classic crypto “death spiral”.
Cascading liquidations were worsened by crypto exchange glitches which left some customers watching helplessly as stop-losses failed to trigger or trades to add more collateral to at-risk positions failed to execute.
Though leverage is not unique to crypto, some things are: the extremely high leverage offered by some platforms (100x or more), the ability to use highly volatile cryptoassets as collateral, the speed at which positions can unwind, and limited requirements for position monitoring or risk management.
A practice called auto-deleveraging likely saved some exchanges from accumulating huge amounts of bad debt, but it also likely slowed recovery by thinning liquidity even further — and it increased the nerves of traders who saw even profitable positions unwound.
In the chaos, one trader profited ~$150 million from well-timed shorts. With an offshore crypto trading platform, potentially offshore trader, and no regulators apparently interested in crypto enforcement, the possibility that someone was trading on White House inside info will likely go unexamined.
Crypto markets stabilized fairly quickly, but the damage was done. Retail traders suffered the highest number of liquidations, and some reported losing significant portions of their net worth. One trader may have killed himself after losing investor funds in the blow-up.
Institutions lost the most in terms of dollars, but the true extent of the damage may be slow to appear. Binance’s hastily implemented $100 million institutional bail-out program suggests things may be worse underneath the surface.
Though the flash crash decimated some traders, its damage was fairly limited. But with regulators out of the picture, rapid proliferation of high-risk crypto products, and crypto firms integrating into traditional finance, this will likely be remembered only as a warning that went unheeded.
Citation Needed is an independent publication, entirely supported by readers like you. Consider signing up for a free or pay-what-you-want subscription.
Molly White
Grovewest
Dan Riley
⚯ Michel de Cryptadamus ⚯
rtificial
Danny Jay Donnell
Glowing Pepe