"Google is supposed to begin distributing third-party app stores inside the Play Store and mirror Play Store content in other stores."
Should @fdroidorg be added to Google Play?
"Google is supposed to begin distributing third-party app stores inside the Play Store and mirror Play Store content in other stores."
Should @fdroidorg be added to Google Play?
@grote @fdroidorg the biggest questions for me are:
- who would update f-droid itself? Would self updates still be allowed?
- by uploading to Google play you would be requires to sign a contract with Google. What would you give up by signing that contract? Would you be required to remove apps that google doesn't like from the store? Forced litigation clauses?
@portaloffreedom @grote @fdroidorg
Exactly, and then some dipshit jury decide for Google and you're FDroid is gone.
I don't understand the problem enough to have an opinion. Libre software should be everywhere, but not at the cost of the devs or the project. If it's 'Same as it is, but also on Play', then sure, it should be on Play, but I suspect it isn't that simple.
@grote @fdroidorg Missing option, though that would probably be unrealistic: "Only if signed by F-Droid".
Why? When Google signs, it adds proprietary BLOBs to the APK as well (keyword: DEPENDENCY_INFO_BLOCK, FROSTING_BLOCK). So the APK as it would then be distributed via PlayStore would no longer be fully FOSS.
Why unrealistic? As for new apps, Google no longer accepts APKs signed by their devs.
@grote @fdroidorg I think I'm the same as other people here - "I don't mind, but anything funny and the 'relationship' with Google must be the first thing to go"
If this is a way to achieve DMA compliance as well, I don't think it meets its spirit.
@grote @fdroidorg I would support adding F-Droid to Google Play with key caveats:
* Never give Google our signing key.
* Someone would need to monitor the Terms of Service to make sure they respect free software.
@grote @fdroidorg
i answered no, but it is not super accurate.
f-droid should give up nothing for alphabet inc. my guess is that alphabet inc requires something and therefore following must be met for "yes".
f-droid can be separately installed by apk with own signing keys.
f-droid can disribute apps what alphabet inc does not like.
f-droid can keep own signing keys for apps.
f-droid can keep own set package ids for apps.
maybe some other not listed.
To NOT be track by Google.
Google knows everything you do, has apps with all permissions granted and set always-on by system.
And you cannot delete'em. Well, in honor of the true, you can; but it's better flash deGoogled ROMs.
In another hand, "Unknow apps" is an euphemism to get afraid you by anything outside of the Google's fence
@lux All opinion granted.
The trees don't let you see the forest.
I prefer willing my time to get a free phone, instead have a slave device from Google's servers, limitations, ads, etc.
Agree to disagree.
Yes, the world needs to know about F-Droid
AND
Yes, it must stay in the free world.
You are presenting a false dilemma.