US farmers are saying they "just need temporary help, until things get better."

Here's the thing. US farm exports- which are mostly soy- CANNOT get better.

Other countries expanded their soy industries to fill China's demand.

We've walled ourselves out of the global market, folks. This is it.

The thing is, this isn't even the first time US ag has wrecked itself with foolish trade wars.

In the runup to the Civil War, US cotton plantations decided to stop exporting cotton. Why?

Because the British Empire's textile mills ran on cotton from US plantations.

Without Southern cotton, the British textile industry would be brought to its knees.

And that would force the British Empire- with the world's most powerful navy- to help the US South in its fight for "freedom."

At least, that's what cotton plantation owners THOUGHT would happen.

What actually happened? Egyptian cotton.

With lots of fertile farmland and desperate for something to sell for cash on international markets,

Egypt's leadership dumped resources into building up cotton farming in Egypt.

By the time the US Civil War was over, so was the US cotton industry.

Egypt had ramped up to growing so much cotton, nobody really needed any from the US South anymore.

This is why "Egyptian cotton" is a thing now!

Egypt grew a little cotton before all that, but not a "main export industry & household name" amount.

This is why it's so important that US agriculture quit its "positive vibes only!" strategy and actually learn from its own mistakes.

So we can stop repeating them already.

Anyway, here's the next Egyptian cotton: Argentine & Brazilian soybeans.

https://mishtalk.com/economics/us-soybean-exports-to-china-drop-to-zero-argentina-and-brazil-win/

US Soybean Exports to China Drop to Zero, Argentina and Brazil Win

China shuns US soybeans in trade war retaliation.

MishTalk

Ope this is going off

Ok folks! My Congressman is a MAGA clown who's on multiple ag committees.

As a farmer, I need ag policymakers with a spine who tell Trump no.

So for every donation to Kim Hardy, who's running against my
Congressman, I will post one (1) ag fact.

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/nc07social

Farm fact: the South is famous for clayey red soil, but a lot of it is actually... sand. Like beach sand. See the yellow on the map here.

Why? It IS beach sand. That's where the shoreline was during the Cretaceous.

This has Certain Consequences for agriculture in the South!

Your classic grain belt-type farming- grain, silos, tractors, livestock to eat all the grain- is what the US considers "real farming."

And it likes big flat plains.

So when there's big flat plains in the US, that's kinda what we like to do.

But in the South? Our big flat plains are mostly deep, DEEP coastal sand.

And grain DOESN'T LIKE SAND

We aren't gonna thrive trying to play the Midwest's game on sand y'all. What are we doing

Attempting to farm Midwest-style on sand has led a lot of people to describe Southern soils as "bad."

This is false. Slanderous, even.

Sand is great!

Root crops love it! It's soft! Long skinny roots like carrots can push downward without hitting rocks or clay pans & turning into this

@sarahtaber for industrial farming I can appreciate long, consistent carrots. But we should appreciate carrots with character.

Question: does sandy soil let the fertilizer used in industrial farming drain away faster? Because I am concerned about industrial vegetables having less critical minerals than they had in previous generations.

@Urban_Hermit @sarahtaber Fertilizer's the stuff that tells the carrot to grow; doesn't add minerals.

@servelan @Urban_Hermit @sarahtaber

Pedantry incoming!

My current position:
P and K, major components of many fertilizers, are minerals. Though they're classified as macro-nutrients (along with calcium and magnesium I think) unlike other minerals which are classified as micronutrients.
#Gardening #Fertilizers

@skua
That is because of their role in growth of the plant right? Like magnesium is needed for electrical impulses, but in a much smaller quantity than nitrogen, so it is micro instead of macro

@Dio9sys
I just checked.

"Magnesium (Mg2+) is not only a quintessential macronutrient but also a cornerstone for the vitality and quality of horticultural crops. Its importance stretches across a broad spectrum of plant physiology, governing photosynthesis, nutrient metabolism, cell membrane stability, enzyme activation, and, notably, its resilience against various environmental stresses."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10628537/

The power of magnesium: unlocking the potential for increased yield, quality, and stress tolerance of horticultural crops

Magnesium (Mg2+) is pivotal for the vitality, yield, and quality of horticultural crops. Central to plant physiology, Mg2+ powers photosynthesis as an integral component of chlorophyll, bolstering growth and biomass accumulation. Beyond basic ...

PubMed Central (PMC)