🤢🤮😭
Just when I thought Lemmy was over the trend of talking about stroganoff.
How do I delete someone else’s comment
Good thing I can, I dont think I will tho
I’d honestly love to see a world war between circumcised and uncircumcised folks. I wonder who would win.

Uncircumcised is the default and probably has a numerical advantage, but once you get circumcised, you can’t go back. The circumcised can always convert people, and there’s nothing the uncircumcised can do to stop their POWs from being forced to switched sides.

However, what about everyone who doesn’t have a penis? Would their allegiance lie with the uncircumcised? Would people who’ve experienced genital mutilation join the circumcised? Who would formerly circumcised people who now don’t have penises join? Would bottom surgery make someone automatically join team circumcision?

This whole thought experiment begs many questions.

Asking the real questions

I think we would see an additional category. People that were circumcised against their will, wanting to go back to the side they may have loyalty for. Someone who was passionate that uncircumcised was the only side to be on, the righteousďżź side or whatever hype they get going on that side.

I think they try to sew back on the foreskin. The thought may begin with some being ashamed that they lost their foreskin and had to “replace it”, but it may quickly become a thing of “who is going to know?”.

Problem is… someone would come up with a way to tell. And the “true foreskiners” do not accept the “sewed on foreskiners”. There is bigotry and divided among their side. Causing an inner struggle and broken down factions of the same side. Some “sewed on foreskiners” may feel that the “true foreskiners” aren’t the side they used to be and won’t accept them anyways, so they removed the replaced foreskin to either join the circumcised or possibly start their own, new side. “The circumcised reborners”

Cursed writing prompt or next ya post apocalypse
Circumplasty set to be the next big craze. Make it bigger than before so it looks like a JNCO leg. “Oh baby I love the way your shit is so baggy”
Or the men that had a messed up circumcision so it looks uncircumcised when soft and circumcised when erect.
The circumcised can learn all the issues with it, then not circumcise their kids.
Oh my, TnJessica, I was not expecting you here :D
I’m a mod here
Unexpected mod is unexpected still.

I meant more the theory than you specifically.

Nonetheless, happy with everything ^ ^

This overlooks female circumcision (it is as terrifying and horrifying as it sounds)
This overlooks intersex circumcision (does this actually exist?)
Intersex operations are usually marketed as “interventions” rather than circumcisions. Also as terrifying as it sounds.
what do you think the Iraq war was, sweaty? ignorant white colonist shows their racism
Wasn’t the Iraq war mostly between muslim Iraqis, who are almost always circumcised, and US-americans, who are also usually circumcised?

TIL Iraqis circumcise their boys!!

I will go with my original thought then, the Crusades - I think European Christendom had not yet incorporated circumcision at the time, but the Muslim world was practicing circumcision, so that would be a war between the circumcised and the uncircumcised?

really weird thing to say about genital mutilation
Obviously the circumcised. They would easily convert the captures enemy soldiers to their ranks but the uncircumcised would not be able to do it.
jokes on you, i wear chainmail
Old enough to have no choice in the matter. We should be pissed at the church, backward medicine and our parents, not each other.
Is the church even part of this? In most countries, christians don’t practice circumcision.
They did heavily in lots of countries including mine. For decades and decades and decades. It was framed in two ways. You could go to hell if you didn’t or you could get really sick and it could fall off. Wonderful direction from the church.
That’s wild, I didn’t expect that even the catholic church gets in on this. Where I live, this would sound completely absurd to most people.
Still feels best with lube.
you can move the skin up and down, so ur hand doesnt have to slide
My skin doesn’t go all the way up when I have a full erection, and I don’t think that’s rare.
I am circumcized so I know foreskin is not a prerequisite for that.
Yeah, but it goes up further and with the head of the penis being the most sensitive area, having that foreskin is quite useful.
It must depend on the person because so am I and I certainly don’t have enough slack to use it like that.
It’s not a prerequisite, it’s just that it works better.
… who’s out here sliding their hand? The skin slides relative to the deeper layers, foreskin or not
people that use lube

[…] Or do you just have that much smegma?

What a day to have eyes.

Not sure I understand, but you grab below glans and force foreskin on and off the penis head repeatedly. Don’t have to pull it all the way to the tip, going halfway is enough. The foreskin skin is much smoother than hands, so barely any lube is required, just the natural skin oil is enough. I wouldn’t call it smegma as it usually refers to white substance full of dead skins and bacteria, but the underside of healthy clean penis foreskin is naturally a little wet.
Why don’t people just use precum?
never seen precum in my life

Probably some combination of not necessarily producing enough (not all people make the same amount) and lack of foreplay/edging

personal anatomical anecdote

For example I really only have precum after a decent amount of foreplay/edging, and not all that much. And a lil lubrication is sometimes useful for getting to that point.

It’s crazy how you poor mutilated people have no idea how it was designed to work.

For one, I haven’t had smegma since my parents taught me to clean behind the foreskin (arguably later than they should have) when I was 7. You think we’re all just walking around with dirty penises?

For two, the foreskin pulls back below the head, you can pull it down far enough that you look circumcised then you can pull it back over. Pull is a strong word it doesn’t take effort, but doing this is pleasurable to the point of ejaculating (i.e. that’s one way to masturbate as a person with a foreskin). No need for lube.

I’m uncircumcised. The foreskin is automatically pulled down/back when you’re fully erect (or at least mine is…), what mystifies me is how you’d pull it back up far enough that you can use it in place of lubrication for the glans, i.e. the most pleasurable part of the penis. Is your foreskin just that long? Mine certainly isn’t.
Sounds like TYL… ;)
So I think there’s 2 parts to this, one is different people are different but the other is that when masterbating one might not be quite as erect as with a partner

Mine only goes half to 2/3s down the glans when erect, and there is enough slack to where if I hold the foreskin lower down it can slide up to mostly cover it. Sometimes a lil bit of spit or some such is still needed to lubricate the glans though.

Broadly it’s probably just difference in genetics of size/slackness of foreskin, idk

every now and then i’m reminded to be thankful i got to keep mine, jesus christ lmao
I’m uncircumcised, actually.
i like how two people disagree with that

It rolls over the glans.

So you just kind of. Like. Roll it.

Me, who has learned where the ladyparts lay, enjoys taking time to get to know them and typically doesn’t need mechanical assistance due to sufficient preamble.
(this is about jorkin’ it)
The true art is in knowing who’s “it” is getting jorked
Hahaha by “it” lest just say… my peanits
a man of culture
It can be wet down there but still bad friction though. Lube is a game changer.