skill issue rule
skill issue rule
Uncircumcised is the default and probably has a numerical advantage, but once you get circumcised, you canât go back. The circumcised can always convert people, and thereâs nothing the uncircumcised can do to stop their POWs from being forced to switched sides.
However, what about everyone who doesnât have a penis? Would their allegiance lie with the uncircumcised? Would people whoâve experienced genital mutilation join the circumcised? Who would formerly circumcised people who now donât have penises join? Would bottom surgery make someone automatically join team circumcision?
This whole thought experiment begs many questions.
I think we would see an additional category. People that were circumcised against their will, wanting to go back to the side they may have loyalty for. Someone who was passionate that uncircumcised was the only side to be on, the righteousďżź side or whatever hype they get going on that side.
I think they try to sew back on the foreskin. The thought may begin with some being ashamed that they lost their foreskin and had to âreplace itâ, but it may quickly become a thing of âwho is going to know?â.
Problem is⌠someone would come up with a way to tell. And the âtrue foreskinersâ do not accept the âsewed on foreskinersâ. There is bigotry and divided among their side. Causing an inner struggle and broken down factions of the same side. Some âsewed on foreskinersâ may feel that the âtrue foreskinersâ arenât the side they used to be and wonât accept them anyways, so they removed the replaced foreskin to either join the circumcised or possibly start their own, new side. âThe circumcised rebornersâ
I meant more the theory than you specifically.
Nonetheless, happy with everything ^ ^
TIL Iraqis circumcise their boys!!
I will go with my original thought then, the Crusades - I think European Christendom had not yet incorporated circumcision at the time, but the Muslim world was practicing circumcision, so that would be a war between the circumcised and the uncircumcised?
[âŚ] Or do you just have that much smegma?
What a day to have eyes.
Probably some combination of not necessarily producing enough (not all people make the same amount) and lack of foreplay/edging
personal anatomical anecdoteFor example I really only have precum after a decent amount of foreplay/edging, and not all that much. And a lil lubrication is sometimes useful for getting to that point.
Itâs crazy how you poor mutilated people have no idea how it was designed to work.
For one, I havenât had smegma since my parents taught me to clean behind the foreskin (arguably later than they should have) when I was 7. You think weâre all just walking around with dirty penises?
For two, the foreskin pulls back below the head, you can pull it down far enough that you look circumcised then you can pull it back over. Pull is a strong word it doesnât take effort, but doing this is pleasurable to the point of ejaculating (i.e. thatâs one way to masturbate as a person with a foreskin). No need for lube.
Mine only goes half to 2/3s down the glans when erect, and there is enough slack to where if I hold the foreskin lower down it can slide up to mostly cover it. Sometimes a lil bit of spit or some such is still needed to lubricate the glans though.
Broadly itâs probably just difference in genetics of size/slackness of foreskin, idk
It rolls over the glans.
So you just kind of. Like. Roll it.