PugJesusErika rules
grueOkay, but giving Sony money is not the most effective way to express that sentiment.
I mean, what’s the reverse of a boycott?
Boycotts don’t work either, for that matter.
It’s weird that we so often see political/social problems and think “I know, I’ll help solve this by giving (or withholding) my money from some for-profit corporation and hope the influence will trickle down to the cause I actually care about!”
Instead, you know we could just support activists working to advance that cause (or outlaw that bad corporate behavior) directly, right?
Which companies PR department wrote this?
Not Sony’s that’s for sure, since the point of my comment is advocating against giving them money.
No, either you’re arguing in bad faith or your rhetoric is seriously lacking. You open with “Boycotts don’t work”, then go on a rant about how people give/withhold money from corporations and then babble something about activists as if you couldn’t do both, boycott a company AND support activism. It’s clear you’re not in favour of corporations but your argument is essentially to not even bother doing the bare minimum because it’s not as good as a fundamentally different economical system.
I opened with “okay, but giving Sony money is not the most effective way to express that sentiment.”
Don’t accuse me of bad faith when you’re the one lying.
Also, I’ve been boycotting Sony for literally decades (and have no intention of stopping). I’m speaking from bitter experience when I tell you it’s not the best strategy, but I also never said not to do it!
If you’re saying it won’t work, why do it at all? Do you want us to waste our time?
I opened with “okay, but giving Sony money is not the most effective way to express that sentiment.”