Also... don't let the miss-pronunciation "an tea fuh" - gain any kind of ground... That's also done to obscure that you are against fascism...
@eniko being called for what they are, fascists, doesn't seem to bother them much either sadly.
More and more, they don't hide their aspirations. As people grovel at their feet or cower in fear of retribution, they grow bolder in asserting their true identity and intentions.
and if "anyone" says they are against antifas.
note to them that they are fascists then.
ask if they want a milkshake.
I so agree.
And antifa almost sounds friendly, it has been an eyesore. So many shortened versions dilute the meanings of an entire cause.
Similarly, I avoid using 'left' and 'right' over here because we have many left and right parties, and it's always best to name the ones I am taking aim at. Name and shame!
are you saying you can derail fascist groupthink simply using alternate phrases?
that they are morons screaming "COMMUNISM!" 34 years after the fall of the USSR and don't even know words have meanings, and only deploy words as weak insults as if meaning "poopiehead"?
that they don't possess coherent thought, merely follow propaganda channels obediently, and thus referring to the same concept but with alternate words will completely miss them?
🤭
"anti-fascist" it is then
i don't know if that has an antidote
no one controls words
words shift in meaning. across time, place, and subculture
sometimes organically, sometimes by purposeful propaganda agenda
all we can do is speak responsibly
and if a large horde uses words irresponsibly, fight the horde. not simply miss meaningful impact by not shifting our own word choice due to their malicious tactics
this is in the specific context of speaking to them
in good faith circles, not an issue
it is true. it's very human. we react to words with inherent biases without thought. all of us
i try to handle it by being very clear in my meaning with my use of words, defining the context of my use in some limited attempt if i feel how i might be misconstrued. nevertheless, flamewars start up. it's difficult and a very human problem. the tower of babel. it is what it is
@benroyce @TCatInReality @eniko
> not shifting our own word choice due to their malicious tactics
I may be a humanist, but I'm still also an atheist, dammit.
@VulcanTourist @TCatInReality @eniko
an atheist as in not believing in a god? or an atheist as in horrible communist antifa requiring subjugation?
(/s heavy sarcasm)
@benroyce @TCatInReality @eniko
Ummm... yes.
I don't think this is about derailing fascist groupthink. Words from their out-group won't sway them. It's about undermining their communication.
Antifa sounds like a group of people, antifascist more like an attitude/mindset/value.
The first seems easier to other than the second.
Fascists don't like "woke" either. And they probably use compositions like "woke extremists" or such. But this doesn't seem to stick.
good point, well taken
you are absolutely right
yes, use anti - FASCIST.
Force them to admit the side they are on, or admit their ignorance of the meaning of the word
Look it up with them when they admit they don't know.
@eniko For Englisch, this probably makes sense. In German, however, not so much – it's just an abbreviation, and speech economy is widely considered apolitical.
When Nazis use your label as a slur, don't move backward, but lean in and fight to reclaim it! Because if this little thing is a fight already, anything bigger will be 100 percent.
@coderanger @DevWouter what? antifa is name deeply rooted in anti-fascist history?
I agree with @eniko 's point, but ‘antifa’ isn't a Trump invention.
Maybe, but I think the point is more that Trump and maga are the best known users.
Besides, it’s not the first time that opponents adopt a term and subsequently corrupt it so that it becomes a slur.