“AI technology is much more akin to a ouija board than anything else: promoting and enabling mysticism, pseudoscience, and pseudo-intellectualism” — (@olivia Guest et al., 2025)

Full paper here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17065099

@Iris @olivia As I wasn't sure how to pronounce it; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouija says (there also in audio): "The Ouija (/ˈwiːdʒə/ ⓘ WEE-jə, /-dʒi/ -⁠jee), also known as a Ouija board, spirit board, talking board, or witch board"
Ouija - Wikipedia

@Iris @olivia With the exception of GROK (manipulated by Musk), I find AI searches to be an excellent means to get evidence-based information with citations. Try it in your field of expertise to test it. Mine being clinical research.
AI slop and the destruction of knowledge

Cite as: van Rooij, I. (2025) AI slop and the destruction of knowledge. This week I was looking for info on what cognitive scientists mean when they speak of ‘domain-general’ cognition. I was curio…

Iris van Rooij
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

Yes, and in addition it'd be good to read this thread and the associated links: https://dair-community.social/@emilymbender/113422515033543544 .

LLMs are quite poor for information retrieval.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) (@[email protected])

Why are LLMs bad for search? Because LLMs are nothing more than statistical models of the distribution of word forms in text, set up to output plausible-sounding sequences of words. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpE40jwMilU >>

Distributed AI Research Community
The Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 Podcast

Our biweekly podcast deflates AI hype and draws attention to the real harms of the automation technologies we call "artificial intelligence".

DAIR (Distributed AI Research Institute)
@Iris @olivia @baldur Except that mystical things do happen, and Ouija boards do work, yes.