Doc Impossible (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image @[email protected] @[email protected] Just want to note that there are some ENORMOUSLY IMPORTANT asterisks to the top-line that this article is blowing past. This is a PROSPECTIVE study. Absolutely nothing definitive. They're trying to set the stage for later, larger research. First: This is a 90-participant complex RCT. That means that there are THREE test and THREE control groups, meaning there's only 15 participants in each test and each control group. Samples this small are EXTREMELY vulnerable to false positives a day false negatives. Studies like these are good at finding combinations of doses that are particularly promising for later, larger research. That's what this study is really doing--an n of 15 is much too small to show a thing reliably. As a dead minimum, you need 30 participants. 100 is far better. Second: Both estrogen and progesterone were tested variables in this study, and the study found that higher estrogen levels than the Endocrine Society guidelines recommend helps breast development. If confirmed, that's a first in field finding, and a way bigger deal than the current headline. Third: the good news: This study uses detailed 3D modeling to track breast development, which is pretty clever, and a far better method than has been previously used to measure breast development. It should be a far more sensitive way to measure small changes over time. Fourth, and the big one: It sounds like one of the study participants is aware that several participants took their progesterone by boofing, rather than taking it orally as the study called for. This is a HUGE issue, esp. if boofing is as good a deal as people think. https://reddit.com/comments/1n9w2xz/comment/ncquqby